Its called public relations, aka propaganda
the truth is, with such a low percentage of voters, America has one of the weakest democracies in the world, and his presidency was weak on top of that to the point of virtually no credibility.
that 30% is all they got, so they make the world of it
2007-09-11 15:42:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
I wonder if you would run your life on polls. I wonder if you would believe that whatever a 'poll' said, in regard to your life, your desires, your decisions, (when the poll was the opposite of your wants), that you would buy it. No, you wouldn't. You would't because you know things they do not know. Such is the life of our President and evey President we've had throughout history.
And how can you say there is no progress? Did you blow off the hearings today? Do you know something the General doesn't? Are you 'on the ground' with the troops? One day history will prove that the so-called 30% were right! and maybe you'll see it too as the terrorists are kept at bay.
2007-09-11 15:58:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mercedes 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Congress's low ratings are due to their inability to stop the war. The Dems have a majority, but not enough to override a veto.
Bush just vetoed a bill to fund a withdrawal. They're stuck until we vote out the remaining sheep who believe lies and call patriots traitors.
2007-09-11 16:00:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by boogaflickah 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just know the more Hate that the Left wing nuts spew and more sites like the Daily Kos, and Moveon.org continue the Anti-American left wing nut bashing of America, it becomes clear that a probably Democrat in the White House in 08, is slipping through your fingers and the Republicans are charging especially since Congress approval rating is lower than the presidents, but you fail to mention that.
2007-09-11 15:48:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by dez604 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
There seem to be a heck of a lot of Republicans out there don't it, to represent only a third of the U.S. that support the dumbest President in world history. They have to support him or they'd have been wrong and they'll jump up and down and scream about WMD's and how Saddam had to do with 9/11 till they strangle on they're own blood! They can't stand to admit that so they will follow President George W Bush to the gates of hell like lemmings.
Thanks
2007-09-11 15:50:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by telwidit 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
properly,it somewhat is extra diatribe than question... enable's assessment: the international commerce center have been given nailed, massive-time, on Sept eleventh, 2001. That replaced into the 2d attack on it. Al qaeda replaced into in touch in the two. The U.S. went after hem -- diplomatically. The U.S. kindly requested the then-governing Taliban in Afghanistan accessible over the (self-known) contributors of al Qaeda. they no longer in effortless terms refused, they almost dared the U.S. to come lower back and get them. To make a protracted tale short, the U.S. reported as their bluff, and the two Al Qaeda and the Taliban went scurrying for the hlls. Iraq? Hussein were gaming absolutely everyone for on the fringe of a decade. the previous president had finished no longer something. the UN resolutions (approximately six?) had no consequence. The U.S. went in. The ask your self and awe area replaced into neglected by ability of a good number of the clicking -- who additionally neglected the incontrovertible fact that the Iraqi military had vaporized. (there's a connection, there -- artwork it out for your self.) The U.S. tried accessible over the rustic to the Iraqis slightly too damned quickly (IMHO). subsequently, there have been nto sufficient infantry/police on the floor to occupy the rustic, as we did in a Japan after WW II. (Had we finished it alongside MacArthur's strains in Japan, i think of we could have been extra suitable off, yet it somewhat is existence.) ok, so now we are caught attempting to get a democracy going the place the median age is eighteen, and one in 4 can not examine or write. it is going to take a jointly as. (Our own democracy takes years to get something finished, and we've a lots bigger literacy fee -- on the order of ninety 9%) interior the interim, Iraq is looked upon as a prize by ability of lots of persons who have no declare to the area, yet do have an interest in seeing it fail. Worse, they have megabucks to throw on the difficulty. If we fall decrease back and enable the fledgling democracy attempt to stand against the array it faces, then Iraq's authorities will maximum somewhat fail. Ten years (to three semblance of stability) is an effective wager -- i could wager at extra like fifteen years. Fifteen years? sufficient time to _educate_ the drawing near technology. practice them to confirm, to place in writing, to _think_ for themselves. that's what it is going to take. wsulliva
2016-12-16 17:49:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by bednarz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, definitely...
A few of them on here talk about Democrats causing the problem and can't even admit many Republicans do not support bush either.
2007-09-11 15:48:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because Republicans are not very good at Math- judging by the way they're losing ground in both the House, the Senate, - & next year- the Whitehouse. NOBODY gets elected by 30%.
2007-09-11 15:50:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Joseph, II 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Because, like sane democrats, we recognize that this country is run on votes, not polls.
You do know the difference.
My side had a chance with Congress and Senate.
We blew it. They did very little.
2007-09-11 15:44:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
I don't know, I've never heard of those numbers. Honestly, you're an American if you support the president or not, because you have to right to freely complain on Yahoo! Answers about the president.
2007-09-11 15:48:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Colt A 2
·
1⤊
1⤋