English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

however why do we still have to hear from slick Willie who took advantage of a young intern, had sex in the oval office, and then lied under oath. If any other exec did this and the company found out they would be thrown out. Yet slick Willie is still the darling of the media and the libs. Way to go you women's libber hypocrites.

What is the standard? They either all go or we forgive them all. What sort of a message does this send to the youth. It's ok to do this kind of stuff if your a liberal since you probably have no morality anyway, but if you're a conservative you have a higher moral standard and a higher legal standard.
I say throw them all out.

2007-09-11 16:35:17 · 7 answers · asked by songndance1999 4 in Politics & Government Politics

7 answers

How can you compare Bill Clinton with David Vitter? Clinton knew of the DNA evidence--hard core physical EVIDENCE, the semen stain left on Lewinski's party dress from that fateful "cigar smoking" incident in the White House. And that trapped "Slick Willie", who for years, enjoyed wriggling out of sticky legal issues.

Where's the hardcore EVIDENCE in the Vitter matter? Wendy Ellis passes a lie detector test--big f*cking deal!! Besides the inadmissability in court, if you BELIEVE enough a lie you state to be true, you CAN PASS a lie detector test.

Believe me: for a million dollars--Ellis can work herself to believe something that DID NOT happen, did. Ellis goes on to say she "can't vote". Well, the only people I know who can't vote are CONVICTED FELONS. Add that to drug addict and prostitute, and you really have a sterling role model of purist truth there, now don't you? Not to mention smut magazine publisher--ALSO A CONVICTED FELON--who can't vote. So who is Larry Flynt trying to snow here, eh?

Hustler's Larry Flynt is out to clean up American Government....yeah, right!! He's crowed that "mission" for years.....and hasn't made a dent in anyone's political career that I've seen. Please, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

Reality check: High level politics is a dirty game. You don't play corrupt and dirty, you get done dirty. And Vitter is getting done dirty from people who seek to wreck his career and life---because Vitter refuses to play dirty.

Frankly, I could care less if Vitter had "spice on the side" with a classy looking hooker---big f*cking deal. Look at the REAL FACTS: Vitter has gone to the hard wall for ordinary Louisiana citizens victimized by Hurricane Katrina---protecting them from brazen high political level corrupt rip-offs.

Vitter has lashed out and exposed the dirty praticies by corrupt insurance companies, seeking to wriggle free from paying their customers for horrific losses to home and property.

Vitter's only crime here is he stepped hard on big $$$ political lobby interests. Vitter betrayed NO ONE.

Vitter should speak out and offer his resignation---when Wendy Ellis can prove she isn't getting one red cent for her sudden and highly suspicious confessions.

2007-09-12 04:14:48 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Wizard 7 · 0 0

I stand with Mr. Wizard!! I'm long tired of dirty politics evidently, in this case, at their sleazy play.

Which would you rather support here: 1. A politician, who despite the fact has had an affair outside their marriage, that has done a great job taking care of their constitiuents as a dutiful politican should?

Or 2. Stick with the inept fumbling politician who has done a terrible job in office---but leads a squeaky clean moral life?

My hunch: Vitter is being sandbagged by political cowards who are angry because Vitter won't play their dirty games.

I too can care less if Vitter had a hooker mistress--he's done a lot of good for those folks in his state, devastated by Katrina!! And I'm taking a stand against the REAL DIRTY POLITICS here!!

So whatever folly Larry Flynt and that hooker set out to try--in my book, they both have FAILED.

2007-09-12 05:03:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The liberal standard seems to be - Does he say something is bad and then do it. Liberals don't think anything is bad so it's perfectly OK to do everything. Frank runs a male prostitution ring out of his high rent apartment. He never said it was bad. so who cares. Liberals are all about changing the definitions of words. Theft by taxation, becomes "fair share of contributions. Infanticide becomes "the right to choose." Homosexual unions become "marriage" When a liberal gets caught, the definitions the thing he did is changes and it becomes OK. However, when a Republican does something bad, they go back to the real definitions of words. Odd, huh?

2007-09-11 17:08:39 · answer #3 · answered by Homeschool produces winners 7 · 0 0

The probel with Vitter is, he wasnt a Senator when he did this. Clinton was President when he was taking advantage of interns in the oval office bathroom....

2007-09-11 16:43:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

i have a question for both sides here , if vitter went to the mustang ranch in nevada , where prostitution is leagle would you want him thrown out, he wouldnt be breaking the law there

or if it was clinton or larry craig if they had male hookers there. what kind of problem is this?

2007-09-11 16:44:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i do unlike prostitutes because of the fact they understand there's a scarcity of intercourse for adult males and that they take benefit by ability of taking money for something no person ought to ever ought to pay for . i do no longer care if any prostitute gets murdered.

2016-12-16 17:52:36 · answer #6 · answered by bednarz 4 · 0 0

MOVE ON ok get over it. he had sex and lied about it. its not a big deal, really, its not.
maybe you dont see a difference about lying about blow jobs, and lying about wars. but i do.

dont worry about my youth ok, worry about yours!

2007-09-11 16:41:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers