Since the politicians do not want to stop the terrorists, we must start planning for the inevitable.
Will the terrorists nuke Los Angeles, Chicago or New York first, assuming only one nuke was used?
The case for New York is that it is the biggest city, has the most commercial wealth and will cause the biggest shock to the financial health of the US (and the world).
The case for Los Angles is it is sin city--the terrorists don't like our "morals" (even though they think nuking us is fine).
The case for Chicago is that if the nuclear detonation is a ground burst, there would be massive radioactivity, and with the westerly to easterly winds would cause the greatest death toll as the radioactive debris will go from Chicago to Detroit, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, New York, Boston, Washington, etc.
Bush will not stop the illegals and has open borders and the Democrats are always soft on national security. We must contemplate this scenario and hopefully wake up DC.
2007-05-03
13:16:27
·
13 answers
·
asked by
RealTruth
3