Do you think we should take out Iran now? why/why not?

Question

"Until they attack us in some way, we SHOULD NOT go to war with any country. We're already overstretched in Iraq"


I get it wait till they have the nuke!

"NUTS"

Answer 1

Fighting this war as we are, is like trying to paint a merry-go-round while it continues to run. The operator of the merry-go-round is Ahmadinejad of Iran, who supplies the insurgents and the militant Sunni, and probably the Shiite militias, and anybody else who is willing to kill American troops.

It doesn't stop in Iraq. Iran is Syria's good buddy, and the two of them keep Hezbollah well supplied, so it can continue it's terror tactics in Lebanon and along the Israeli border with Lebanon. They also keep Hamas well supplied, so it too can launch it's attacks against Israel, from Palestinian territory.

Now if you go in the other direction, you will find some pretty conclusive evidence that Iran is equipping The Taliban and even al Quaeda.

By equipping all these factions, we are talking about money, munitions weapons, explosives, and any and all contraband needed to launch a vigorous campaign !

Unless you're a brain dead democratic Congresswoman, who thinks she's smarter than everybody else, I don't see how there's another alternative to this war. Iran must be stopped, and it's military establishment must be destroyed !

Answer 2

Well, it might improve the situation in Iraq, a little, but overall I think that it would be a bad idea to invade Iran. I think we should wait for them to provoke us so that we don't end up going in there by ourselves and look worse than we already to do the rest of the world.

I do think that we will be at war with them eventually, the question is just when.

Answer 3

Are you kidding me? "Take out" a country? There are innocent civilians in that country.

Iran should not be allowed to have nuclear weapons, but as of now they only have enough for nuclear power, which is provided for in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. (it says that a country has the right to uranium for nuclear power) The worst they've done is kidnap the British soldiers, so if anything should be done, it should be Britain doing it.

Until they attack us in some way, we SHOULD NOT go to war with any country. We're already overstretched in Iraq.

Answer 4

Not just yet, because of the problems we're having trusting our own government, but sadly enough when we're ready it may be to late for a victory.... Just like the War in Iraq today.

We should have dropped Saddam earlier.

Answer 5

I read this question in error; I thought you meant Iraq... so if you read my answer, you will see why I think this is an insane question. What have they done to us? And we want to nuke them too??? Shame on you. Unfortunately it seems there's a pox on all our houses these days. Pray for us. Pray for peace. God Bless All.
==============================================
Bagdad was always known to be the "stronghold" by those that absolutely do not want the US to "own" any part of Iraq. Got it? That's the part they don't tell you. Think about it. Aliens are in their country, killing them, so they they "centered" in Bagdad and they will fight to the death before they stop. And they are being supported by outside forces, so there is no end to their manpower no matter how many you kill slowly. In order to ..."win".... we would have to "waste" the entire city in one fell swoop. Then we can "own" it. So, if we stay, and want to win, we have to finish the murderous job we started over 4 years ago.... and nuke it. I DON'T WANT THAT SO WE NEED TO LEAVE. END OF WAR. These are scared and "spiritual" people that don't want our influence (read allow US corps to own their oil). Even when we talk about rebuilding, we talk about our people doing the work, like the Iraqi men can't or don't want to work. That is not the case. Iraqi men want to rebuild their own country, but after 4 years, they see they don't get to rebuild their country because it is being rebuilt by US contractors at high wages.... and the Iraqi men are like the "unconnected" workers in the US... unemployed or vastly under-employed. So don't be a "sheeple" (sheep + People = sheeple) following the GOP'er talking point of the day. Remember the Alamo. (or in the Iraqi's case = Bagdad) .... in this case we need to remember that the Iraqi's are fighing like Jim Bowie, Davey Crockett and Stephen F. Austin.... so we need to leave, like the uninvited guests that we are.... not to mention the small fact that we went to war without UN authority = an "illegal" war i.e.; we are in violation of our own treaties. Wake up America.

Answer 6

No. Our country is in enough termoil as it is. To start a 3rd war...thats just plain rediculous. We need to fix our problems here in america and not worry about other countries. We spend more money each year on defense than england, france, china, and russia combined. The middle east is not a threat to us. Only when our leaders fail to react to signs and clues to an oncomming attack do they become a threat.

Answer 7

No, I'm already seeing someone right now. Taking out Iran could be really awkward (I've gotten into trouble that way before).

Answer 8

If they become a threat to the free world, you better believe it! That's exactly why we should impeach Bush for getting us into this current B.S. war, illegally, which has our military strung out for nothing!

Answer 9

no, Iran's people want the current leader ousted so just give it time. Iran will start trade and eventually stop acting like a child.

Answer 10

No because iran had done nothing