When the US fought the North Vietnamese, no one believes that we went to war for any reason other than to halt the spread of communism. Whether or not you agree with the reason for our involvement in Vietman, I don't think that anyone believes that we went to war in Vietman to steal that nation's natural resources. If we had, at the very least, legitimate national security concerns that were consistent with a morally grounded foreign policy (I'm refering to our motives, not the consequences of that war), why is it so hard to believe that the Bush administration also has, at the very least, legitimate reasons for invading Iraq?
2007-04-10
16:28:46
·
11 answers
·
asked by
marc
2