What Laws can help pull troops out of Iraq?

Question

What Laws can help pull troops out of Iraq? If they are any?
Please Smart Answers Please?!

Answer 1

There aren’t any laws right now but Congress has broad powers under the Constitution. Under the “necessary and proper” clause of the Constitution, Congress has the power to make whatever laws it deems necessary to carry out the functions of the US government. It reads as follows:

“To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.” Article I, Section 8

The US Supreme Court decides on a case-by-case basis whether Congress has acted properly and within the scope of those powers.

The current problem is less one of constitutional law and more a political one. There are still too many Republicans in Congress for the Congress to be able to override a presidential veto. So, even if Congress were to pass a law totally defunding the war or even requiring that the troops be brought home immediately they still have the problem of overriding a veto.

Answer 2

It is not so much a question of law but of Constitutional powers.

The President, as Commander in Chief, can send the troops in anywhere, anytime without congressional approval. But, if he keeps them there for over a period of time, then Congress does have to approve the mission/war. This is why the President will generally go to Congress first for authorization. Which is exactly what happened with Iraq. And the Congress did, in fact, authorized the war.

At this point, the Congress can vote to cut off funding for the mission in Iraq, however, many people feel this would be viewed as undercutting the troops and that it would be hugely unpopular. Who knows...it could go either way since there is widespread displeasure with the way the war is going.

Congress could also vote in a timetable for withdrawal as a condition of continued funding.

Of course, the President can veto these bills. Currently Congress would not be able to override the veto - it would take a 2/3 vote to do that.

Answer 3

Congress must declare the war as illegal and make a law for the withdrawal of the troops in Iraq.

Answer 4

There aren't any right now. Congress could pass a law to stop paying for troops in Iraq, but don't expect that to happen soon.

Answer 5

Wow, what a gaggle of ******** solutions. here is what you're finding to renowned: Republicans blaming Obama for pulling American troops out of Iraq in 2011 could undergo in strategies, is that throughout October 2008 George W. Bush replaced into president whilst the status of Forces settlement replaced into drafted and ratified via Iraqi lawmakers a month later in November 2008. The pertinent element of the settlement that President Obama venerated replaced into that, “all the united states Forces shall withdraw from all Iraqi territory no later than December 31, 2011.” nevertheless, Republicans are assailing the President for abandoning Iraq they have been totally arranged to proceed occupying in perpetuity, and ignore that as nicely Bush, an unwell-cautioned approach via former Republican guy-god commonplace David Patraeus mishandling of the so-noted as “surge” that created the militant insurgency threatening to thoroughly tear Iraq aside and end thoroughly destabilizing the region Bush’s invasion began 11 years in the past.

Answer 6

None.

There is only ONE Commander In Chief and that is the President of the United States. Whether one voted for him or not is irrelevent. Whether one supports our efforts in Iraq or not is irrelevent. Congress CAN pass legislation to cut off funding the war but that also cuts off funding the troops. That sends a message to our enemies that America is a big gutless wonder that can be defeated. that message was conveyed in 1975 when we turned our backs on the South Vietnamese people, who became victims of a communist genocide that the "peaceniks" conveniently ignored. Again in 1979, when Jimmy Carter refused to believe that his chums in Iran did not commit an act of war when they sacked our embassy and took Americans hostage. Again, in Lebanon when Reagan pulled out after a terrorist "martyr" committed suicide by blowing himself and the Marine barracks to pieces. Again, when Clinton ignored the warning signs sent by the bombings of our embassies in Africa, the bombing of the USS Cole, not to mention the first bombing of the WTC.

Anyone who believes that we are not in a war against terrorists who have every intention of destroying America (that, by the way, means Americans and anyone else residing in America) had better wake up to the realities of the world today. Your shock and awe will amaze you about the time your head is being sawed off with a dull knife.

Answer 7

There are no laws that can do that. Congress authorized the President to use military force. Democraps and Repubs voted and authorized it. Using defense budget to try and force an exit is immoral and bowing to public opinion instead of using military knowledge.

Answer 8

Just write your Democratic congressmen and tell them to grow a set and cut the funding. They know what will happen if they cut the funding, that is exactly why it has not and will not happen.

Answer 9

the law of finance

Answer 10

The troops are pawns of a foolish administration , let them get what they deserve.

The american people are getting exactly what they deserve in IRAQ......they wanted war...they got it.

NO sympathy what so ever...for a Rambo Nation and the fools that run it