Military - April 2007

The navy, army, marines, or air force? Excluding all nuclear weapons and hydrogen bombs. Be honest as to who you think would win, dont just pick your favorite branch. List them in order as well, first, second, third and fourth.

2007-04-01 09:39:35 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-01 08:56:14 · 11 answers · asked by Josh S 2

I have the feeling that too many people in this country are too "warlike". Glorify the military and love to send troops to fights in their interventionist wars. USA has become somewhat like Ancient Sparta, Kaiser's Germany [before Hitler], Imperial Britain and the once "mighty" Soviet Union. Meanwhile the budget is suffering huge deficits, the country doesn't seem "safe" and we fear the "terrorists". What do you think, folks?

2007-04-01 08:52:38 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

what do others feel should be done? I feel this is an act of war and hope that the British do the right thing and retaliate. Or have the Brits lost their will? I hope not. My heart goes out to those poor sailors and their families; however, as pow's they should refuse to cooperate with the Iranian terrorists and keep their mouths shut. ie. name rank and sn.

2007-04-01 08:42:46 · 10 answers · asked by el cabo 2

2007-04-01 08:40:33 · 4 answers · asked by peacemaker 1

I highly doubt it, i am just wondering.

2007-04-01 08:24:03 · 10 answers · asked by naturally323 1

is this the militarys way of supporting the troops?

2007-04-01 08:16:02 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

My heart is in Iraq, but my body in Iran.

now i see all of you agree with war.

I know that Jew and Israel want to take my land Iraq for themselves and USA and you almost kill all of us.

You try to show that, that is Iraqi are killing each other, but all of them done by Israel.

some day you will pay for all blood in Iraq.


A very proud Iraqi.

2007-04-01 08:01:47 · 44 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-01 07:54:55 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm Sure that some of you will say he is No longer relevant, but was sadame any more when the US went into Iraq? Was he killing Americans? Was he attacking anyone at the time? Was he a real threat when he couldn't even fly planes over his own country? Bin Ladden is still at large, His group is still attacking people all over the world. Including US troops, His organization is funding in large part, the **** in Iraq, Don't dismiss him as irrelevant he is doing half of what your fighting to prevent. Why are there not more troops in the area where he is believed to be hiding? Didn't Bush say in the past that he would go where ever it took to get him,and that he would not be swayed by borders ? Even saying he would go into Pakistan if necessary, Why has the hunt for him been all but suspended ? Does he have secrets that the us Government doesn't want known ?

2007-04-01 07:06:08 · 6 answers · asked by Shawn S 3

I have this report to do on WWI biplanes but i forgot how they syncronized the machine guns! I know it had something to do with a lever between the propeller shaft & the gun's firing pin, & the process was too expensive so most pilots like Roland Garros took their chances with the propeller being hit. But what the heck did the lever do to the gun to do tht?

2007-04-01 06:49:57 · 12 answers · asked by DeanB 2

We did the same with 911, right? Somebody destroyed twin towers, and we are now killing somebody, even if it's another "somebody". God bless us, we have the truth, we have democracy, we are against all evil.

2007-04-01 06:41:50 · 21 answers · asked by kkpurro 1

ever failed, scored low in training, lied, broke the rules or anything like that.

I'm asking because I finally want to do something important with my life after all these years of being a slacker. What i'm saying is that I want to be a part of the military. I don't want to be the guy with the gun, but I would be honored to support those brave guys with the guns fighting out there.

So my question is this: Have you ever known, met or heard of anyone who was given one job, such as a desk job administering paychecks and then all of sudden, in the middle of his duty, been reassigned to a job such as infantry?

Not that I think that infantry is a bad job...just the opposite actually, I think it's one of the coolest things a person could do; they do the duty most guys couldn't even fathom. So my question remains: Have you ever met or heard of someone who'd been assigned one job, and without his consent, was put in a job he didn't want to do, such as the infantry division?

2007-04-01 06:35:30 · 17 answers · asked by World Expert 1

Which branch offers more job and education opportunities?

2007-04-01 06:26:28 · 10 answers · asked by mozartgirl2000 2

What do you think ? How will the new soldiers and modern armies of the world look like. Will they use laser rifles , guns and such , full body armors or some sort of power exoscelets . Usa army is developing some of those projects . I'm not talking about 20 feet tall robots or Gm super soldiers. Please be realistic.

2007-04-01 06:22:24 · 7 answers · asked by milauwio 1

a bad idea. i do. do we really need a 3rd world war or for that matter the first and second ones to begin with. NO! NO! NO! poor people who bush and his army will be bombing. how i want to help them.

2007-04-01 05:57:53 · 6 answers · asked by i'm addicted to yahoo answer 2

Lets say i screwed around in school all my life and didn't take anything seriously. Now I want to join the air force but have little educamacation or practical skills (such as electronics, engineering, or mechanical) and I get a p*ssy desk job. Then while in the air force I also take classes and study up on something such as mechanics, after two years can I take a test or something to prove i'm knowledgable in another area besides pushing paper and try to get a more skilled job?

2007-04-01 05:37:31 · 17 answers · asked by World Expert 1

I have seen many servicemen from England and the U.S. over the years paraded on TV by their captors and of all of those, I have never seen them smiling and laughing and sooo excited to disagree with their governments than I have from these Brits over the past week. I'm not sure they are being so coerced by the Iranians.

2007-04-01 05:29:31 · 10 answers · asked by huckleberry1 3

The NeoCons stipulated that Iraqis would benifit from America's invasion, and would be better served than they were under Saddam. However a comparison of the death and dislocation that has occured within Iraq since 2003 provides an interesting contrast. (Over 2 million refugees having fled the country, and an estimated 600,000 killed with countless thousands injured and wounded). And if we compare what that would mean if we translate the figures into similar numbers for the United States it becomes frightening, with over 23 million forced to flee and over 7 million killed. It is difficult to find the success from our invasion, when one sees the death, destruction, and dislocation that has resulted.

2007-04-01 05:09:41 · 7 answers · asked by Sailinlove 4

how can it be proven as to where the vessell was at the time?

2007-04-01 05:00:52 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-01 04:50:35 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.nypost.com/seven/03312007/news/nationalnews/miss_syria_nationalnews_ian_bishop.htm

This twit has no biz being in her position. She's plain out STUPID AND GULLIBLE.
As she has tea and cookies in Syria's finest chambers, with the top world promoter of terrorism and a viscious dictator, the Syrians themselves are snickering at what a dumb FEMALE she is and how they're going to screw the US by convincing her that Syria is some kind of way to peace in the ME.
These people would rape her, gut her, and make her into a bar of soap and a lampshade if she were a Syrian.
They PROMOTE the murder of Americans---PELOSI IS BY ALL INTENTS A MURDERER !!
SHE'S NUTS! Get her gone!

2007-04-01 04:29:48 · 9 answers · asked by BS,MS,Ph.D 2

why do we let little garbage countries bully the world around. when we do stand up for ourselfes they stall all talk agreements to buy more time everytime they stall they are still working on there bombs to destroy. all it is doing is alowing them more time to get more technology why must we keep on having all this time inbtween talks it should end before two times of sitting down then actions should be taken to the exstream do you think so or should we just keep talking while they get there bombs together and hold the wolrd hostage.

2007-04-01 04:04:41 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-01 03:51:44 · 5 answers · asked by Drop the donkey 2

2007-04-01 03:37:50 · 4 answers · asked by stk1990 2

It is very probable that British sailors did go into Iranian waters. At sea there are no lines to separate waters of a country from international waters or waters from another country. Apparently it is complicated for the British government to apologize. If Iranian authorities do not deliver back unconditionally these sailors in a short term, United States has an excellent reason to continue with the U.S. troops at this part of the world. War will become at large. Perhaps it is time for real diplomacy. Perhaps it is a "Jaque Mate" movement from Bush et al, to continue with their objective entirely.

2007-04-01 01:46:12 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Bush led his country and others into a war on a lie. I believe He should pay for every single women and child who has died in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as every single american soldier.

2007-04-01 01:40:17 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous