do you think world war 3 is?

Question

a bad idea. i do. do we really need a 3rd world war or for that matter the first and second ones to begin with. NO! NO! NO! poor people who bush and his army will be bombing. how i want to help them.

i don't know what countries it's between and if it has nuclear weapons. my dad just told me that there's gonna be a 3rd world war.

Answer 1

I know! It is a bad example to children, and we just need to learn how to get along with each other or dont interact.

Answer 2

Unfortunately, WWIII will be global suicide, therefore in answer to your question, as long as there's rational superpowers who believe in MAD, there will be no WW3. By definition, the next world war wil be nuclear, how could it not. In a nuclear war there will be no winner. In a nuclear world, the only true enemy is war itself.

The next World War will involve a nuclear exchange, how could it not if both sides believe no price for victory will be too high. In the first 30 minutes, nearly a billion people will have been vaporised, mostly in the US, Russia, Europe, China and Japan. Another 1.5 billion will die shortly thereafter from radiation poisoning. The northern hemisphere will be plunged into prolonged agony and barbarity.

Eventually the nuclear winter will spread to the southern hemisphere and all plant life will die. You ask what country would be victorious, you are asking when will we commit global suicide. My answer is it won't happen soon because the larger superpowers are more rational than the rump states in the middle east.

While we hear talk of a nuclear-Iran or a confrontation with NorKor, little is said about the 2 bulls in the glass shop. The arsenals of Russia and the US are enough to destroy a million Hiroshimas. But there are fewer than 3000 cities on the Earth with populations of 100,000 or more. You cannot find anything like a million Hiroshimas to obliterate. Prime military and industrial targets that are far from cities are comparatively rare. Our biggest threat is from an accidental launch by the Russians.

At the point of global suicide, it doesn't matter who is on what side....where you go to hide, or how long you can survive. In a nuclear age like i said before, the only true enemy is war itself.

Answer 3

Keep your hat on! I do not see a third WW in the immediate future, although it seems that many small wars are likely to break out in the next couple of years.

Answer 4

How is it automatically Bushs fault for something which hasn't happened yet? At any rate there are plenty of countries who can get the ball rolling for the next big one.

Answer 5

What countries is it between? Does either side have nuclear weapons. If they do then it is bad. A fight between conventional forces wouldn't be as bad.

Answer 6

we must face it
this day is coming
god help us