Now that Iran has american hostages, shouldn't we attack Sri Lanka?

Question

We did the same with 911, right? Somebody destroyed twin towers, and we are now killing somebody, even if it's another "somebody". God bless us, we have the truth, we have democracy, we are against all evil.

Answer 1

Canada, Sri Lanka has no oil, Canada has plenty and the solders could walk to work, close enough they wouldn't have to drive. It would save a lot of money on the war and would be good for the ecology. .

Answer 2

When did Iran take American hostages? That was back in 1979. Are you having flash backs again? Why do you want to attack Sri Lanka? Bush never named them as part of the Axis of Evil. North Korea has kept a low profile if you have noticed.
Iran is looking to get a beat down.
Are you proud of them taking British hostages or did you prefer them to be American, as you mistakenly said. Id have to ask 'The Shrink', but I would say that was a Freudian slip.

Answer 3

You poor misguided soul. You have the appearance of democracy and nothing more. When did Iran take American hostages? I must have missed that one.
You aren't against all evil. It's all over the place. It has infected the white house, congress and the justice system. It has completely taken over the news media.
You have had your rights stripped from you by Bush getting rid of Habeous Corpus. As a neighbour I feel so much sympathy for Americans ,but I feel nothing for the powers that be. The American way of looking at "itself" has to change. Who said they needed you to defend us all from terrorists?
The free world needed you when we were fighting Hitler and you refused until you weren't making any money from it....then and only then did you join us in the fight. So really America...get the boys and girls home. Clean your own house before you call ours dirty.

Answer 4

Dude!

Iran released the American hostages in 1981 just before Ronald Reagan was sworn in as President of the United States.

Perhaps you are thinking of the United Kingdom.

It is an easy mistake, after all, they both speak English.

Smoke another bowl and try again.

Answer 5

I wouldn't be surprised if we did attack Someone. I do smell conspiracy here. The US has been itching for a confrontation with Iran but didn't know exactly how to get into one without some political ramifications. So they coordinate with the British and have them send Soldiers into Iranian waters. They get captured and of course the US being Britain's top Allies are now talking tough. It's almost like the perfect storm. The US have a reason now.

Answer 6

Iran has american hostages? We attack the people responsible, so it should have been Sri Lanka?

I don't think you're getting the whole story.

Answer 7

Iran has British hostages not American ones, right?

Answer 8

So what was the connection between Nazi Germany and Pearl Harbor.? You don't know the connection between the Towers and Iraq. There maybe none, but you still don't know why we invaded Iraq. There are good and bad reasons we did what we must now finish, and your in the dark? Or do you just disagree?

Answer 9

Where did you find the source telling you that Iran now has American hostages? And are they American troops? By the way, we does not mean the entire U.S. population. The invasion of Iraq was the plot and concoction of his highest majesty, George W. Bush.

Answer 10

No because there is no oil in Sri Lanka.

As a member of leading oil company and a good personal friend of the president - I think I could profit more if we attacked Kuwait. Coincidentally, we would be sending a message to Iran, that if they ever did anything that displeased us again we would ruthlessly invade another OPEC country.