From there are two government-led official investigations on the JFK assasination, the committes concluded that the assasination is solely carried out by Lee Harvey Oswald.
I assume most of you reading this may have watched at least once either Discovery Channel or History Channel shows of investigating the JFK assasination.
I, an enthusiastic investigator of the JFK assasination, have contacted incredible amount of information on this affiar.
I will not go into detail on this. But there is one mystery still unsolved- even by today.
Let's exclude all the other issues-motives, plans, etc. Let's just focus on the assassination itself.
If Oswald was the only gunner at the scene, shooting the president at the back, then why does the famous Zapruder film show the president being shot at the front of the head?
Seeing is believing. Here is the film.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ef5fa0e9d7
Same video, but different website: http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=kennedy%20assassination&search=Search&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&spell=1
Clearly, the last fatal head shot was fired from in front of the president, not at the back of the president, where Oswald was known to be shooting.
If you closely observe the film of the moment when the president gets shot in the head, the bullet came from the front of the president. It is proven by
1. The film clearly shows the president is getting shot in the front forehead, foolproof. You can clearly see the wound at the president's front head, as the bullet strikes.
2. the president's head flips back as the force applied to the target.
3. Also, at the moment of the impact to the target (JFK's head), the blood splash tells us the bullet entered from the front of the president's head. Throughout the entire shooting time, Oswald was at the BACK of the president.
(by the way, just before the headshot, the president was shot through his throat. After a few second, Jackie asks him, "Are you okay?")
Therefore, there must be a second gun man.
Anyone who has shot a gun before, should be able to understand what I am talking about.
I am not saying Oswald is innocent. I am saying there is a possiblity that Oswals was one of the shooters at the scene. (Or, Oswald may have not shot him at all.) Because Oswals was also assasinated before going into a further interrogation, this affair remains mystery.
But one thing for sure; I am confident there was another gunman.
If you would like to leave any opinions, you are welcomed. But no insult, profanity and attacking the other users, please!
2007-11-18
09:11:32
·
5 answers
·
asked by
davegesprek
1