Law & Ethics - November 2006

2006-11-19 10:31:39 · 2 answers · asked by britt v 1

A Judge states that the DA and defense must turn in their motion to supress the evidence 15 days prior to the trial. It has been over a month since he placed the order. The defense turned their paperwork in prior to the the judge's 15 day trial deadline.The prosecution has been six days late? Will this case get dismissed or is it likely that it will continue heading to trial?

2006-11-19 10:27:56 · 2 answers · asked by Joe B 2

my husband and i staring seeing a pcyhothepapist for marital problems and the receptionist told us they took our insurace and our only out of pocket expense would be a 15$ co-pay. But she didn't realize my insurance was a different branch of the one they took and it did not cover the full session. so six weeks went by before they realized it and sent us a bill for 800$ what the ins. co. did not cover. It was their fault for not checking what kind of ins. we had and letting us know what our total cost would be before starting sessions so i don't feel it's our responsability. Thier taking us to court now are we responsable or is it their fault?

2006-11-19 10:05:50 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Recently, a lawsuit that I had been involved in for 2 years over a car accident finally settled. I was just wondering how long until I will recieve the money. Also, can the insurance company decided to take the money back?

2006-11-19 09:58:29 · 7 answers · asked by Girly 2

A Judge states that the DA and defense must turn in their motion to supress affidavits 15 days prior to the trial. It has been over a month since he placed the order. the defense turned their work in prior to the the judge's 15 day deadline prior to trial. The prosecution has been six days late? Will this case get dismissed or is it likely that it will continue heading to trial?

2006-11-19 09:54:32 · 2 answers · asked by Joe B 2

A growing number of binge drinker including young teen kids are clogging up the already overstreched NHS and Police networks. Would you bill them?

2006-11-19 09:40:02 · 19 answers · asked by Rob W 1

in the last 3 weeks got 3 dud coins...i suspect polish bus drivers of passing them as all 3 have been found after using buses drove by polish drivers. 2 other members of family also caught out and also suspected polish bus drivers.... anyone else having same problem.? (northeast england)

2006-11-19 08:50:17 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

I've been working for a small company for 2 years, and the pay is satisfactory for me. I got to know the President of the company by chance recently. He's around 40, has a family. Last time there were only two of us in his office, I was orginizing all the files for him. His pen dropped on the floor and he knelt down to get it. I felt something is on my feet, and that's him! He said he had never seen such a sexy feet. (I was in a pair of nude pantyhoses and a red high-hell shoes) He asked me if he can kiss my feet. I got so angry and want to leave. But the door was locked and he put me down on the sofa. He went crazy afterwards, he kissed my feet, and finally ejected on my pantyhoses. He said he would never touch the area above my hips and no sex with me because I don't want to have trouble. He just want to play and have sex with my pantyhosed feet.He would keep my job if I can offer him my feet and $1000 for each time. Shall I quit? But I really need the pay of job.

2006-11-19 08:46:33 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-19 08:38:53 · 3 answers · asked by msmith4757 1

I have a question!

2006-11-19 08:38:21 · 1 answers · asked by reni768 1

A friend of mine received a speeding ticket for going 80mph in a 55mph zone. He said he's going to fight the ticket. I told him that if he fights it and loses, he's required to pay the court before leaving. He says he doesn't have to, and he can wait out the 20-30 day wait before paying if he loses.

Whose right in this situation?

2006-11-19 08:34:57 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

BC canada white rock/south surrey thats where they are

2006-11-19 08:32:11 · 4 answers · asked by yvettelcoleridge 1

Does remaining in a committed relationship let the couple define their relationship how they want it and realize everyday that you're there because you WANT to be there rather than because a piece of paper (a marriage license) says so.

Or is marriage sacred and is the ultimate expression of love between two people?

This isn't about deep commitment phobia but people who have chosen to remain life partners rather than actually doing the aisle walk....

2006-11-19 08:27:49 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

margins, size of type, etc.?

2006-11-19 08:21:55 · 4 answers · asked by aeic05 1

I'm in a new development that's nearing completion. The developer's lawyer sent out letters to all homeowners claiming there's an interest in a homewowner's association for the purpose of buying street lights, a park, and maintenance of the developer's entrance signs. The people I've talked to so far are all against it.

2006-11-19 08:17:51 · 5 answers · asked by Albert E 1

I got caught for shoplifting before.I was told that I could'nt shop at the store anymore.I got caught shoplifting at another store which was the same store as the other store but in a different location.So they charged me with shoplifting and trespassing.I thought I was only not allowed to go to the one that I was caught at the first time.Tomorrow I go to court does anyone know what might happen.Do you think they will lock me up or fine me.Please dont be funny I learned my lesson and will never do this again?So give me your best answer.Or let me know if you know anyone who was in the same situation and what happened to them.

2006-11-19 08:12:24 · 11 answers · asked by decaturkings 1

Former IRS CID Special Agent Joseph Banister Acquitted of Tax Fraud And Conspiracy
Government Unable To Prove U.S. Law
Requires Income Tax Withholding or Filing

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-5297571003407049929&q=joe+banister


Sacramento California -- On Thursday June 23, a federal jury found former IRS Criminal Investigative Division (CID) Special Agent and CPA Joseph Banister not guilty of all counts alleging criminal tax fraud and conspiracy related to actions he took on behalf of a California business owner who had openly defied the IRS over several years by stopping withholding of all income and employment taxes from the paychecks of his workers.

During the trial the Department of Justice was unable to put forth any evidence that Banister had either engaged in a conspiracy or had acted unlawfully when he shared legal research with business owner Al Thompson concluding that he had no legal obligation to withhold taxes from his workers or when he (Banister) prepared corrected tax returns for Thompson claiming his taxable income was, under U.S. law, zero.

During the trial, Banister's former supervisor at IRS’s San Jose CID office, Robert Gorini (who testified via video recording) when pointedly asked, was unable to cite any U.S. law that required Banister to pay income taxes.

Banister, who was forced to resign in 1999 after questioning IRS officials about their legal authority, gave Thompson’s worker’s a presentation in 2000 which reviewed his detailed investigative research of U.S. tax law which concluded that not only did the IRS lack any authority to impose income taxes on the workers, but there was no legal requirement for the business to withhold any taxes from the worker's paychecks.

Banister is part of a nationwide effort seeking to force the U.S. Government to respond to a series of detailed legal Petitions for Redress of Grievances directly challenging the authority of the IRS. Last summer, the We The People Foundation initiated a landmark lawsuit with 2000 plaintiffs against the government because it has refused to answer the Petitions.

The Right-To-Petition lawsuit, of which Banister is a plaintiff, is the first time in history that U.S. courts have been asked to define the meaning of the final ten words of the First Amendment.

Court documents for the RTP lawsuit and scholarly research regarding the Right to Petition can be downloaded from the Lawsuit Information Center on www.GiveMeLiberty.org.

Following the verdict, Banister was greeted by a throng of WTP supporters and members of his family.




Also check: http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-4312730277175242198&q=from+freedom+to+fascism


and
http://web6.streamhoster.com/vinyasi/stream/861_Evidence/broadband/index.html

2006-11-19 08:05:54 · 2 answers · asked by axeldones 1

2006-11-19 07:58:20 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

If you've seen the very recent episode, what do you think might happen to House, especially Wilson since his career is at stake?

Is it unethical of House what he did in the hotel?

Is what he did called manslaughter? involuntary manslaughter?

I'm not giving out specifics just in case some people haven't seen the recent episode.

2006-11-19 07:56:46 · 5 answers · asked by Team Jolie-Pitt Aniston 1

The case is Warrem Bloomquist, Relator, vs. Commissioner of Natural Resources, Respondent. A05-147 Court of Appeals of Minnesota 704 N.W.2d 184; 2005 Minn. App. Lexis 764
Filed Sept. 27, 2005?

2006-11-19 07:54:09 · 1 answers · asked by aeic05 1

Underage girls are being sold as slaves by their own families in some underdeveloped countries.
In one Cambodian town,one family gave one of their daughters away for a color TV.

2006-11-19 07:46:53 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am a supervisor in a call center that has recently started devating people when there is no call volume, but requiring them to stay around so we can have them log back in if the call volume picks back up. I don't exactly think this is legal, and it's FAR from ethical, as we are tell the agents to log out, not paying them, and telling them that they can't go home.

2006-11-19 07:44:31 · 4 answers · asked by crono_wolf 2

I'm a student in debate. Our new topic is resolved: A victims use of deliberate deadly force is a just responce to repeated domestic violnce. I know about the cycle of abuse and everything but the key word in the resolution is deliberate. So in a cross examination time I think people will ask if its okay for the victim to go into the abusers room and shoot him, taking the abused life away?? I have a responce to this I just need people's inputs. If you can it would be greatly appreciated.

2006-11-19 07:41:24 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

and whats a d drive please?

2006-11-19 07:40:55 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

My apartments have been overrun with hoodlums.

There is loud banging thug music all day and night, 100 kids running around fighting, screaming and tearing stuff up. Plus my neighbors do some kind of voodoo crap in the hallway every night

they are infringin upon my religious beliefs and my human right to a peaceful existance.

Will the ACLU support me? Probably not, I am white and I have a job.

2006-11-19 07:35:20 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-19 07:35:19 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

My ex and I are legally divorced. There is an order for him to pay child support for our son. He has always paid it, and is happy to. After being divorced for some time, we decided to get back together and try to make it work. He put a brand new (and much better!) ring on my finger, and we will be getting married sometime next year. The very annoying factor of all of this, is that every month he has to mail off his child support payment to the Kansas Payment Center, and then they mail it back to me.... at the same house he mailed it from!!! In Kansas, child support payments MUST be made through the payment center. Now that we are back together all of our money is joint again and we pay all the bills as a family. It is kind of a strain for us to mail off $630 every month and then have to wait a week and a half for it to come back. And on top of that, they keep a $10 fee. It's only ten dollars.... but why would we want to give it away? What can I do to stop the support order?

2006-11-19 07:34:54 · 2 answers · asked by KSmom24 3

I really do not believe that those spineless yellow bellied wimps of a party called democrates (the less wealthy republicans) will do anything at all along these line except in the most meek and mild manner way like forming a committee to look into forming a committee about studing the idea of making a committee to look into ways the president might have made some possible tactical error that could latter be dismissed to let the whole thing blow over and be forgotten.

BUT let us fantasize for a moment and pretend that he is put on trial.

Would that have any affect on the USA's world standing as a fair and balance nation of laws?

2006-11-19 07:34:37 · 7 answers · asked by concerned_earthling 4

hey,, I have to hand this project by tomorrow and I havent even started the introduction, so I'd really appreciate if you guys give me some clue.. thnksssssssss!

2006-11-19 07:31:26 · 1 answers · asked by liz 1

what i mean is is it still considered a crime if you were willing to let them do it?

2006-11-19 07:29:32 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous