I've noticed on a lot of court shows (Judge Mathis, Judy,etc.), that many people sue for pain and suffering. Sometimes it's the Defendant, adding it in addition to their original purpose of suing, and then, in some cases, the Plaintiff countersues. While i'm not trying to judge these people, sometimes I think it's a bit ridiculous to sue for pain and suffering for something like a cell phone bill. In your opinion, do you think they do this mainly for more money, because their original point of suing won't get them much? Also, outside of the Judge Judy or Judge Mathis show, how well would the claim of pain and suffering hold up in the courtroom?
2006-08-24
05:17:53
·
6 answers
·
asked by
LibraT
4