There is no way to answer this question. If you are planning to go to law school, you have to follow your gut. Don't follow the money. Not all law courses or degrees end up with you even being a lawyer. Use your first year to decide where your passion lies and pursue it. Maybe litigation is your thing? Me personally, I love international corporate law because I speak 7 languages and love every aspect of the industry. Maybe real estate law? or maybe you just want to work in government and the law degree and contacts get you in the door to the judiciary commitee or something. You need to experience and study and find whats right for you.... even 6-7 figure salaries wont buy you happiness. Good luck! email me if you need more... lauramr015@yahoo.com
2006-08-24 06:38:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Slutlana 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
We can't answer this for you. "Best" is a subjective term that only you can figure out as it applie to your life. So, I think red is the best colour. You think blue is the best colour. See what I mean? You need to talk with someone (like a career counselor or someone at a law school) about the time demands and the different areas that might interest you or that you might be good at. Then you can determine what's "best" for you.
2006-08-24 06:42:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
This really depends on your interests and abilities. You can make a lot of money as a family law or personal injury attorney, but be desperately unhappy because of all the whiny crybabies you have to deal with on a daily basis. Corporate attorneys, tax attorneys and real estate specialists can make a lot of money but can be booooring. No matter which field you choose, you will be more successful if you enjoy what you do.
2006-08-24 11:00:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by shomechely 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on your interests.
If you're in the US, then you'll have to study most areas of law, as part of law school, to pass the state bar exam.
That will give you some insights into what areas you might enjoy.
2006-08-24 06:36:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
using fact IMHO human beings have been primitive back then. devoid of the subculture we take with no attention those days, human beings act like animals. and that they did no longer respond to reason. back, perplexing for us to think of in the present day, yet we've been steeped in hundreds of years of acculturation that makes us admire regulations and experience incorrect approximately transgressing them. dad and mom spank and punish little ones using fact little ones could be unruly and can desire to have limits placed on them. whilst they improve up, no longer lots. BTW even in historical situations, Jews had standard courts that meted out justice, and capital punishment became exacted somewhat not often (even one death penalty in keeping with 70 years might carry shame to the extreme court docket). So the thought persons have been basically stoning one yet another left and stunning is a mischaracterization.
2016-09-29 22:43:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋