There are several questions I raise about the death penalty, and this goes for both those who support it and those who oppose it.
1st: The excuse of "if you do x, y, and/or z, you deserve to die". While that can be used to justify the death penalty, it also brings into question, "why do we put limitations on what the state can do to them?" Based on the rationale, we could bring back the gallows, or instate burning, gassing, garroting, or the such "because they deserve it".
2nd: The United States is one of several countries that still have the death penalty. With that said, we're one of the few countries that uses it regularly. Perhaps we could find a medium, a short few crimes that is punishable by capital punishable by capital punishment? Already on the table, as far as I'm concerned, are multiple murder, kidnapping and rape, meaning both serial and repeated offense. Someone can be framed, but not for some 10 different cases, that's unbelievable to me. Also, shouldn't there be
2007-09-27
08:45:12
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Huey Freeman
5
in
Law & Ethics