compromise is the answer to our political woes in the US, (which means neither side get everything they want ) or should it be a 'to the victors goes the spoils' process?
The later seems to inspire a constant pendulum process.
2007-09-27 08:29:27 · 6 answers · asked by angibabi113 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
ak6702 - are you seriously comparing our politicians to Hitler? And Evil? Maybe I don't disagree, but that seems harsh.
2007-09-27 08:44:14 · update #1
Seems like both sides are simply applying "payback" to each other.
We ALL suffer because of this
2007-09-27 08:34:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Compromise all the way. The problem is the religious fanatics and the ultra-libs won't meet on common ground.
2007-09-27 15:37:15 · answer #2 · answered by Lisa M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't forget Hitler only wanted the Reignland.That's compromise for you..Only a fool thinks you can compromise with evil!
2007-09-27 15:36:17 · answer #3 · answered by ak6702 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It depends on the issue at hand. I am a conservative. I will not compromise on my core values. I try to explain to the uninformed how my beliefs have merit. If they don't accept it, it is their loss.
2007-09-27 15:44:42 · answer #4 · answered by regerugged 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Compromise is the answer, but it isn't going to happen.
2007-09-27 15:32:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It sounds nice but it'll never happen. American politicians are just too stubborn.
2007-09-27 15:36:20 · answer #6 · answered by Still Beautifully Conservative 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋