The Epic has begun to end
The grand destruction incident of September 11, 2001 (which wrote the awesome opening chapters of millennium epic) and the upcoming incident of 2008 Beijing Olympics (which is being marketed as an epic in itself) have a common link as far as their target is concerned.
I would not like to keep the suspense go on to the last line keeping you guess what their target is. The target is simply the power politics which could retain their esteem as an unopposed world power in the future. Don’t you think they are interlinked in this manner with each other if not on their conduct as the former is directly linked to terrorism and the latter to goodwill? Again I am not going to reveal anything about the terror threat to the Beijing Olympics. But like the September 11, Beijing Olympics is also a threat to the world. To know how? You have to go into the past as well as the future.
It will not offend me if this idea is bitterly attacked as an affliction of my mind on the first hand. Yet it has got lots of sense to sound sagacious despite its attempt to yoke two identically different magnetic ends by unnatural force though. It may seem, in view of general perception, out of sync on the surface when we keep in mind the crucial ends of the terror-torn Arab world and the divisible Asian society under inimical issues like unresolved border-disputes, religious fundamentalism, transborder terrorism and overlooking of the global fears to protect the planet. However, a keen sight, which must be seriously taken into account as an effect to see through the deceptive surface to x-ray the credibility behind acts backed by both America and China under the shadow of above stated events, can help us understand the sacred gameplan to sweep the world order under their sceptre in near future.
The U.S. after the crash of twin towers celebrated the pro-American wave in the whole world. It got support even from those countries which had always seen it as an imperialistic state—a state that could prove as a threat in number of ways like economic, diplomatic and cultural.
So it was the best time to utilise the moment actually availed by destiny. America squandered no time and deployed its forces in Afghanistan with the help of Pakistan to paralyse the Taliban regime and Al Qaeda network. Everyone knew it was like a trout fighting against the mighty shark whale. But the U.S. strategy was something different. It wanted to establish its permanent base in Asia and there could be no place as perfect as Afghanistan is. From there it is capable to keep a closer vigilance on its adversaries—Russia, India, and above all China. It was also necessary from America’s point of view as the nuclear arms race in Asian countries and their undeterred arsenals had unveiled the inability of American security agencies. Its espionage agencies had been a laughing stock for the world community after they had failed to suspect India for its nuclear tests conducted at Pokharan in 1998 during AB Vajpayee’s regime. Later on Pakistan also followed the suit, although it’s a different question that America did not try to stop it deliberately after having known the reality.
So what could have been the best time than the time when there were ready-made pro-American feelings running through the minds all over the globe? It would be ridiculous to regard America’s victory against the Taliban regime as mere victory. Rather it should be called as American occupation of Afghan regions to run its military activities against the Asian giants—China and India—having installed on throne a puppet ruler, Hamid Karzai. It is not just an emotional analysis but truthful comprehension. If it was not so, why is America prolonging its stay in that part? Do you really think that America has been facing problems in the hills to track down the remaining Taliban supporters? In fact America does not want to track them down so instantly so that it could stay there and have installations to serve its anti-Asian agenda to enfeeble the biggest continent.
It is everything under the impression of September 11 pretence. Having faced no problems in Afghanistan it was time to create pressure on Iraq and more directly on Saddam Hussein and its Bath party which had crammed the minds of Iraqis with anti-American sentiments. It had been for long a nuisance to the U.S. So the Bush administration in view of undeterred intrusion in Afghanistan started imputing Saddam for keeping weapons of mass extermination. It sent the UN officials to Baghdad to find out traces of such kind. But it led to no clues as America had been bragging to get the international favour. Finally it launched attack on Iraq with its cronies under wide international opposition. The U.S., however, found no weapons of mass destruction on whose basis it had waged a war against Iraq. Now Saddam has been executed, to the delight of Bush and Blair, the former British premier and Iraq is looming in the dark alleys of uncertainties and militant violence.
Thus, the September 11 made America intrude the South Asian region; and further this victory encouraged it to make the Arab world paralyse too. The only difference is that in its first campaign it had pro-American feelings and in its second unpopular campaign anti-American feelings. However, the undeniable fact is it has been successful in utilizing the famous crash whose historical significance moves up to the level of the French Revolution in the world history.
It’s the first side of the coin having discussed America’s unruly and arbitrary behaviour after what it experienced on September 11. But don’t we find China keeping on close heels with the U.S. the way it has started exploiting the fruit of 2008 Olympics. China knows the importance of this huge event to be held in Beijing in the summer of 2008. It wants everything accomplished beneath the Olympic apparel that can’t be conducted otherwise without international opposition.
To shape its mammoth intentions it started digging its border land skirting India. First of all it built up the railway line penetrating Tibetan region from Shanghai to Lhasa. Now it has announced officially to build up a highway close to the base camp of Himalayan Mt. Everest under the pretence that the Olympic torch will be taken to the highest point. So the highway to Mt. Everest will be constructed in the period of only four months.
No doubt, China has displayed its great capability to engineering having built up roads, bridges, skyscrapers, railways in the highest regions, and many other state-of-the-art institutions that the world can envy for. But it does not mean it has attained the unilateral right to play with nature. The projected highway which will straddle upto the base camp of Mt. Everest is posing a great threat to the environment as it will increase the flow of people to that part.
We have already observed changes into the Himalayan ecosystem in recent years that are threatening the Asian future. And the Asian future lies in the Indian subcontinent.
Most of the rivers—the Indus, the Mekong, the Yangtze, the Yellow, the Salween, the Brahmputra, the Karnali and the Satluj—that flow in this part are fed by the Himalayan snowmelt in the highland. If this highway is built up, it will lead to the warming of Everest. And the water conflict will spur in Asia. Apparently it looks that the highway is just an attempt to throw Asia particularly India into huge water crises in the future.
The Olympic Games are just nothing but a storehouse to manipulate its vicious ends. Just think awhile if the torch is not taken to the base camp what difference is it going to make to China’s reputation? Have not there been Games before in other countries? What have they done special to make them historic? Games are played to spread the goodwill message. The goodwill message can only be carried by the thorough involvement of the participants in the games. They are not meant to create conflicts especially by threatening nature.
Many Indian experts believe that the highway is a threat to Indian security. But my belief that intuitively portends a bleak future not only for India but for the entire world is instilled in its being inimical for the fragile Himalayan ecosystem.
Isn’t China prone to the U.S. in its manhandling the world in order to occupy the power that could retain their status as an unopposed world power in future? If America is disrupting the world order on its past event—the September 11—by creating chaos in the South Asian region and the Arab world, China is disrupting the world especially Asia on its future event—the 2008 Beijing Olympics—by playing wantonly with nature.
The former event, undoubtedly, can be considered as the bleak beginnings for a dark epic with its added and against-the-world action in parts of the world. But the latter event, if not confined to its original purpose in time, will surely take this epic not to a tragic dénouement but to a catastrophic one, with no spectator left to experience its “catharsis” (if it is concluded with this Aristotelian term).
2007-08-22
15:34:14
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Military