English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 29 March 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

Bill of Rights (Liberal Version)

Amendment I
There shall be no show of respect for any Christian religion, or people who believe in a Christian religion, or Christian-based holidays, and no one who professes belief in any Christian religion shall be considered fit for any government position or office. No law shall abridge the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people, peaceably or otherwise, to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances, unless that speech, that press or those people are in support the actions of Republicans, or in condemnation of the actions of Democrats, or might be construed as giving offense to anyone.

Amendment II
The military and police being the only forces necessary to the security of the State, the right of the common people to keep and bear arms shall be removed, weighed down with restrictions and regulations until private citizens can no longer own anything that might be used as a weapon.

Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace, be regarded as necessary to maintaining that peace. When at home, soldiers of any rank are to be considered disposable, interchangeable, dull-witted robots, who can be instantly trained at need, and considered dangerous, uncontrollable, dull-witted barbarians bent on murder, rapine and torture when overseas. As a group, American soldiers are to be lauded and pitied, but individually, reviled.

Amendment IV
The right of all people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against any searches and seizures shall not be violated without a court-ordered warrant, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by the kind of evidence of wrongdoing that could only be gathered with a warrant, and the warrant must precisely describe the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Personal security shall be considered inviolable for American citizens, foreigners living in America, and foreigners living elsewhere.

Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime, because crimes are the fault of society, and not the individual. Republicans and Conservatives, on the other hand, shall be deemed guilty upon indictment by a grand jury, or even upon accusation of wrongdoing. No person shall be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, unless that person show evidence of Conservative thinking. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, unless that person shall be unborn or mentally incapacitated, or otherwise be deemed useless to the State, or a burden. Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation, public use being defined as anything that might benefit the State in some way, including higher tax revenue from said property.

Amendment VI
In all prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial in the media, and later, if necessary, by jury. Guilt shall be determined by the extent of public outcry that can be created over the nature of the crime, but reduced by the level of celebrity status enjoyed by the accused. The word of anonymous witnesses and experts may be used as evidence in the media trial. If a person found guilty of a crime is able to claim disadvantaged status -- meaning non-white, non-Christian, non-male, poor or homosexual -- that person shall have the right to full and open public sympathy by celebrities and members of the media, unless that person happens to be Conservative or Republican, both of which are forbidden to members of disadvantaged groups.

Amendment VII
The right of trial by jury shall be preserved for captured opponents during time of war, who shall be accorded all the rights and benefits of American citizens in addition to the disadvantaged person status, which shall automatically be granted to all "enemies" of America.

Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted, not even curtailment of any freedoms or rights whatsoever. Those held for committing a crime shall be afforded luxuries in entertainment and food to make up for the injustice of being incarcerated, as well as the right to at least one book deal.

Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people, especially the unquestionable rights of abortion, tax-paid health care and gay marriage.

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution are reserved to the Judiciary, who shall have the power to overturn decisions made by vote of the people, amend the Constitution and even change the meaning of the words written herein at will and without recourse by the people.

2007-03-29 09:39:42 · 32 answers · asked by GREAT_AMERICAN 1 in Politics

2007-03-29 09:38:54 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

As soon as you start criticizing Bush or Republicans they start ranting oh you hate America, you want the terrorists to win, you're the enemy from within, blah, blah, blah.

If liberals have the "race card", conservatives got the treason card and the liberal media card. Don't take any responsibility. Just blame the media.

2007-03-29 09:37:05 · 29 answers · asked by trovalta_stinks_2 3 in Politics

It's not a topical or a sarcastic question, I really want to know why this was not a realistic option to a war that's how old?
Couldn't less than 20 Marines have done the job in Iraq or anywhere else America has gone since the 1980s?


,,,,



/.

2007-03-29 09:31:37 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

2007-03-29 09:31:37 · 23 answers · asked by Geo Washington 3 in Politics

this statement: Progress is good for America. Do you agree or disagree and why? are there historical facts that make you feel one way or the other? I just want some opinions. Thanks!

2007-03-29 09:30:33 · 11 answers · asked by a-ren 4 in Politics

Just be happy Bush told you about it.

2007-03-29 09:28:05 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Too restrictive...I mean you have to be 21 to buy and consum alcohol....18 to buy and smoke ciggarettes...you have to be 18 to buy a lighter,cold medicine and you have to be 18 to buy markers.....What is this world coming to pretty soon you will have to be 18 to buy toilet paper!!!!!
and they say were the land of the free!

2007-03-29 09:27:30 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

UPS doesnt always require a signature. i sent a package to the wrong address (my fault), but UPS delivered it to their front porch and the person who lives at the address i mistakenly sent it to says they never got any packages. the package was worth over $800. what can i do!!! i cant say it was stolen b/c there was not signature. the person says they never got a package, and i am the one that addressed the package wrong! aaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhh!!! help.

2007-03-29 09:24:33 · 4 answers · asked by abbie 2 in Law & Ethics

I keep hearing this assertion and I'm sorry, but it's crap. None of us has lost our freedom to speak freely. Don't assume that freedom comes with a guarantee that no one will react, or react negatively, to what you have to say. You are still allowed to speak. You do not have a Constitutional right to the final word.

2007-03-29 09:22:40 · 17 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6 in Politics

And also the Saudis have a brutal regime. Don't they need liberation and democracy too?

2007-03-29 09:22:04 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

I'm amazed at how few people in the general public, media, and politics have neither the brains nor guts to call our tactical situation in Iraq precisely what it is. An occupation.

Proof positive that if you repeat something often enough, people will believe it.

2007-03-29 09:17:50 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

I didn't even get to say goodbye. The freedom of speech is gone. I know soldiers who regret serving 22 years in the Military defending a country that is no longer worth defending. If I walk around D.C. with a "Bush Sucks" T-shirt on, I will get arrested and interrigated. Now, don't get me wrong but, remember that guy in the 1940's............ Oh ya. The leader of germany in the 1940's............. ummmm... Hitler! oh ya. Well, remember how if you said something bad about him or didn't like him they'd throw you in a prison or a camp without even a trial. Hmmmmmmmmmm................. Now lets think about this....... Now, if the FBI want to come and knowck on my door......... let them. HEY FBi!! YOU GUYS ARE A GOD **** JOKE!!!! YA I SAID IT! WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO!! AREST ME!?!?!?! WELL I HAVE THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, OR WAIT, I'M SORRY MR. NAZI, I FORGOT, I CAN'T SAY ANYTHING I WANT ANYMORE BECAUSE AMERICA IS NOW IN A FACIST STATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please, I just need an answer.

2007-03-29 09:16:53 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-03-29 09:15:31 · 9 answers · asked by Marwan Arikat 1 in Military

I just don't find the media very liberal or liberal enough.

2007-03-29 09:14:15 · 18 answers · asked by celtic farmer 2 in Politics

He doesn't seem to when he preaches the neo-con moral agenda on his show.

2007-03-29 09:12:48 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-03-29 09:12:17 · 13 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6 in Politics

2007-03-29 09:12:11 · 4 answers · asked by shaq 1 in Law & Ethics

I was told he was in the Air Force !? If he was alive today, he would be in his late 60's. He died of cancer. He lived in MONTREAL, CANADA when he died.

2007-03-29 09:09:29 · 6 answers · asked by Balou 1 in Military

2007-03-29 09:07:48 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

2007-03-29 09:07:27 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

Is it legal for public schools to be sending home religious materials, such as ads for "this Sunday’s revival at this church" or "resurrection Easter egg hunt" events at local churches?

Also is it legal they hold "bible classes" as an elective during normal school hours.

Now your child doesn't have to attend...but if they do not, they sit in an empty classroom with 1 or 2 other kids or get shuffled off to another class (normally the grade below)

This often adds to childhood pressures as it becomes a reason to tease the child that didn't attend.

Are they able to do this to kids?....are the pressures of school not enough?

this is happening in NC state...please answer only if you really know something about this I do intend to take action on this matter.

2007-03-29 09:07:19 · 7 answers · asked by P V 1 in Law & Ethics

even if it is,,,which is a ridiculous idea,,,,what does finger pointing do when the whole wolrd is going to the birds

Do you think Democrats can save us from global warming,,,,lol

2007-03-29 09:04:47 · 13 answers · asked by funny d 1 in Politics

Company A submits a bid for a project by Company B. After doing so, Company A realizes that a mistake has been made in the calculations and that fulfilling the conditions will bring about bankruptcy. Nonetheless, they cannot withdraw their bid and win the contract. Even though Company A is still legally bound to perform, is there any way out of the contract, taking into account the harm that it will bring to employees and subcontractors which will invariably not be paid in full?

2007-03-29 09:04:42 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

My friend is joining the military for that one weekend a month thing,(I forget what its called) as a cook because someone told him as a cook he can not get called over to Iraq, is this true or is there still big possibility of him going? I have nothing but repect for the men and women who go but Im afraid to lose my other best friend. (last one wasnt the war it was a drunk driver) Please and thank you. I will also respect his choice.

2007-03-29 09:03:39 · 11 answers · asked by Borg_MonkeyDrone 3 in Military

2007-03-29 09:02:07 · 22 answers · asked by ♥ Mae ♥ 4 in Law & Ethics

2007-03-29 09:00:59 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

2007-03-29 09:00:26 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

fedest.com, questions and answers