2007-03-29 09:15:31 · 9 answers · asked by Marwan Arikat 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Probably never. We are still in Germany and Japan after 60 years.
2007-03-29 09:20:21 · answer #1 · answered by Homeless in Phoenix 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
As of now, when Bush decides to, or when a new President is elected and decides to.
Congress is attempting to pass laws setting a fixed timeline for withdrawal by 2008, but the House and Senate bills are still different, and neither has passed both chambers and been signed into law. So, we have to wait and see what Congress does, and then what Bush will do when it hits his desk.
2007-03-29 09:25:00 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
When we get the job done and Iraq is stable enough to take care of itself. Makes sense to me.
2007-03-29 09:22:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's really too general of a question. Do you mean:
1. Entirely? Never.
2. Substantial troops? Next year possibly, depending upon events.
3. Advisors? Never.
2007-03-29 09:21:29 · answer #4 · answered by Blackacre 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Either when the democrats force the withdrawl or when we complete the mission. Now, which do you think is better? I guess, if you're a democrat, you don't care about the mission or the welfare of the military or the worth of those who died there. All you care about is political points.
2007-03-29 10:06:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
when Iraq has a stable government and strong military able to stand alone without American support.
2007-03-29 09:53:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
when we are embarrassed a little bit more and made to look like we have absoluteley no understanding of foreign policy and how to execute it effectively
2007-03-29 09:26:20 · answer #7 · answered by souperhandsome 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
May 15th, 2047
2007-03-29 09:19:23 · answer #8 · answered by Keith 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
NEVER< Not until the job is done and NOT before!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-03-29 09:43:43 · answer #9 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋