I reject as too restrictive the implications Design => Intention => Mind of an advanced life form. I replace them by Design => Direction => laws (which act everywhere in human beings and elsewhere). So, the laws of nature without a personal God or an individual mind can account for the intelligent design behind the universe.
By "personal God", I mean a God that someone (such as Jesus) can know personally. I like the term "Intelligent design", even without the notion of a personal God, because it says that the laws of nature have a direction. Things progress, the genome became more and more complex, etc. I believe in a personal God, but I don't think that this aspect of the laws of nature is needed to explain the creation of the universe and evolution.
The personal God is an aspect of the laws of nature that is only needed to explain our personal experience, usually an inner experience, unless of course you met that personal God externally, say, in some coffee shop.
2007-10-01
05:35:32
·
9 answers
·
asked by
My account has been compromised
2