Your reasoning shouldn’t be based on dogma alone. Direct experience, provable statements or supporting testimony please. Imagine this as a lawyer show on TV. If the [holy book of choice here] is your primary, you at least need a second witness or supporting evidence to back the claim. You can't call yourself to the stand either.
Definitions:
* A Theist believes in a supreme power(s) in any way shape or form.
* An Atheist does not believe the existence of a supreme power.
* A Gnostic believes that DIRECT experience/knowledge of higher orders, possibly but not necessarily including a supreme being, is possible and necessary.
* An Agnostic believes that direct experience of such higher orders, especially of a supreme power, is either impossible or irrelevant.
The definitions are a bit narrow, and you might disagree strongly. You could also feel you fit into more than one category, conceivably even those in opposition. If either’s the case, please raise the issue and argue it.
2007-01-19
03:56:07
·
20 answers
·
asked by
dead_elves
3