2006-12-10 18:55:39 · 8 answers · asked by POOH69 1 in Other - Society & Culture
I know its wrong but I'm curious if anyone really knows why...
2006-12-10 18:54:03 · 13 answers · asked by huggskisses20001 2 in Etiquette
what is the step by step official process for a catholic priest to leave the church. How long does it take once he starts the process.
2006-12-10 18:51:46 · 10 answers · asked by David M 3 in Religion & Spirituality
Occam's razor says Exodus is a myth. What do you say?
2006-12-10 18:51:36 · 25 answers · asked by STFU Dude 6 in Religion & Spirituality
My motto is if it ain't working try something else ...
Most of the males in the Middle East are not too bright
Females have been forced to watch and say nothing ....But the good thing about it is that Women have watched and learned what not to do
2006-12-10 18:51:33 · 16 answers · asked by Tiffany 2 in Other - Cultures & Groups
No. Chess dosen't make you smart,smarter or the smartest. If i played 50,000 games of chess and learnt somthing from every game, then surely i will be able to recognize most tactics that players use... It might increase your problem solving abilities... But chess is a board game... Like checkers, or othello. If it did require intelligents kramik would be 500,000 euros richer.
2006-12-10 18:51:25 · 14 answers · asked by DOOM SQUIRREL!! 1 in Mythology & Folklore
im currently deployed to Iraq and i have no idea what to get my mom forChristmas, i already got my dad something any ideas?
2006-12-10 18:51:23 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Holidays
2006-12-10 18:51:01 · 3 answers · asked by richardkhuu74 1 in Other - Cultures & Groups
Ladies - how do you feel when you are walking down the street, and men stare at you and make comments about your appearance? Does it flatter you to get the attention - or does it bother you to be stared at and harassed?
2006-12-10 18:50:19 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Etiquette
(Male/female, that is)
Not abusive relationships, just 'troubled' ones.
2006-12-10 18:48:36 · 6 answers · asked by seaofcolour 3 in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
2006-12-10 18:47:51 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Religion & Spirituality
Mine sure does! He is a yellow lab retriever who snores like a sawmill.
David
2006-12-10 18:47:39 · 19 answers · asked by David T 3 in Religion & Spirituality
Few people ever think to enquire about the supposed enemies of Cain as defined in Genesis. Who could they possibly have been? Where would they have come from? According to the Bible only Adam and Eve, along with Cain and Abel, existed - and Cain had apparently killed Abel. Therefore, if one accepts the text as it stands, there was no one around to be Cain's enemy!
The Sumerian Gra-al was an emblem dignified as the Dew Cup. It was identified in all records (including those of Egypt, Phoenicia and the Hebrew annals) as being an upright, centred red cross within a circle - and has long been recognized as the original symbol of the Holy Grail.
Another anomaly is presented soon afterwards in Genesis when we are told that Cain found himself a wife. Who on earth were her parents if Adam and Eve were the only couple alive? Then, without confronting this anomaly at all, Genesis lists the names of Cain's descendants.
It becomes clear from all this that some very important information has been edited from the Old Testament narrative. Plainly, there were plenty of other people around at the time, and it is not difficult to find their stories outside the Bible.
In order to further enhance the historical succession from Cain, he was married to his half-sister, a pure-bred Anunnaki princess called Luluwa. Her father was Enki and her mother was Lilith, a granddaughter of Enlil. Although not giving the name of Cain's wife, the Bible does name their younger son Enoch, while the Sumerian records cite his elder son and kingly successor Atûn, who is perhaps better known as King Etâna of Kish.
Etâna was said to have 'walked with the gods' and was fed from the Plant of Birth (the Tree of Life as it is called in Genesis). Henceforth, the kings of the line were designated as being the twigs of the Tree - and the ancient word for twig was 'klon' (clone). In later times, this plant or tree was redefined as a vine - and so the Graal, the Vine and the Messianic Bloodline became entwined in the Holy Grail literature of subsequent ages.
By virtue of their contrived breeding, this kingly succession was modelled specifically for leadership and, in all aspects of knowledge, culture, awareness, wisdom and intuition, they were highly advanced against their mundane contemporaries. In order to keep their blood as pure as possible, they always married within a close kinship, for it was fully recognized that the prominent gene of the succession was carried within the blood of the mother. Today we call this the mitochondrial DNA.
And so was born a tradition inherited by their kingly descendants in Egypt, and by the later Celtic rulers of Europe. True kingship, it was maintained, was transferred through the female and kingly marriages were, therefore, strategically cemented with maternal half-sisters or matrilinear first cousins.
2006-12-10 18:46:17 · 11 answers · asked by fuck 3 in Religion & Spirituality
The story can now be progressed by considering the oldest grant of arms in sovereign history - an entitlement which denoted the Messianic bloodline for all time. The Sumerians referred to this insignia as representative of the Gra-al (the nectar of supreme excellence), but biblical history refers to it as the Mark of Cain. This Mark is portrayed by the modern Church as if it were some form of curse, but it is not defined as such in the Bible. Genesis actually relates that, having got into an argument with Jehovah over a matter of sovereign observance, Cain feared for his life. Consequently, the Lord placed a mark upon Cain, swearing sevenfold vengeance against his enemies. It has never been fully understood why Jehovah should decide to protect Cain with this mark, when it was he who held the grievance against him. But the fact is that Jehovah did not make this decision; the mark was settled upon Cain by the Lord - and the Lord (the Adon) was not Jehovah (Enlil) but Cain's own father
2006-12-10 18:44:59 · 6 answers · asked by fuck 3 in Religion & Spirituality
With so many Americans here of varying ethnicities, would not the sections for race seem like a waste of space in our present time?
2006-12-10 18:44:07 · 10 answers · asked by George A 5 in Other - Cultures & Groups
I live in Miami, Florida (West Kendall Area) & I am on a low budget. Christmas trees around here are pretty expensive. Any suggestions for a place to buy nice tall & plump (REAL) Christmas Trees that are low in price?
2006-12-10 18:43:26 · 6 answers · asked by DiVenanzo™ 5 in Christmas
Say whatever they want about whites and it is fine. They are even praised at times but if a white person can't say anything about a black person. It is not fair. If a black person can call a white person a name then a white person should be able to do the same.
2006-12-10 18:43:13 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Cultures & Groups
I am writting on the topic that "why a person feel danger from other person today" (aaj insaan insaan se kyuin darta hai). so please help me in adding urs ideas and knowledge.
2006-12-10 18:42:36 · 14 answers · asked by arif k 1 in Religion & Spirituality
A friend says you can't, I say you can...who's right?
2006-12-10 18:42:36 · 11 answers · asked by ambertmbg1 4 in Religion & Spirituality
Do you think royal personages are spoiled? Even the American White House pales in comparison to this massive pile of masonry.
2006-12-10 18:40:22 · 8 answers · asked by In Honor of Moja 4 in Other - Society & Culture
2006-12-10 18:40:02 · 12 answers · asked by TrISteN 1 in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Just curious, write what u want on the topic that is and i know i ask too many questions...just humour me :)
2006-12-10 18:38:34 · 19 answers · asked by cactus_chic3 2 in Religion & Spirituality
i know there are going to be racist people in the world but this is getting out of control. im tired of going to websites like you tube and reading the comments like " these black pigs and monkey's". i know some dont like us but why cant they have the respect to keep the comments to themselves. this is so.....barbaric!
2006-12-10 18:38:18 · 14 answers · asked by TONI S 1 in Other - Cultures & Groups
Why do people love to stereotype???
i mean why people like to stereotype certain race have certain characteristic.. for me i always get stopped and asked by people about my ethnicity ... coz they always say .. my race people(native south east asian-very2 dark brown) dont look like that... people asked if i'm mixed white .. coz they say i'm too fair for my race.. huh???i get so tired of people asking ... and no i am not mixed blooded.. does anyone get this often especially people of colour...
2006-12-10 18:37:48 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Society & Culture
The first king of the Messianic succession was the biblical Cain, head of the Sumerian House of Kish. On recognizing this, one can immediately see an early anomaly in the traditional Genesis story, for the historical line to David and Jesus was not from Adam and Eve's son Seth at all. It descended from Eve's son Cain.
Conventional teaching generally cites Cain as being the first son of Adam and Eve - but he was not; even the book of Genesis tells us that he was not. In fact, it confirms how Eve told Adam that Cain's father was the Lord - who was of course Enki the archetype. Even outside the Bible, the writings of the Hebrew Talmud and Midrash make it quite plain that, although Cain was Eve's eldest son, he was not the son of Adam.
The Old Testament book of Genesis (in its translated form) tells us that Cain was 'a tiller of the ground' - but this is not what the original text relates. What it states is that Cain had 'dominion over the earth', which is a rather different matter when considering his kingly status.
The Bible translators appear to have had a constant problem with the word 'earth' - often translating it to ground, clay or dust, instead of recognizing it as relating to the Earth. Even in the case of Adam and Eve, the translators made glaring errors. The Bible says, 'Male and female created he them, and he called their name Adam'. Older writings use the more complete word Adâma, which means 'of the Earth'. However, this did not mean they were made of dirt; it means (as the Anchor Hebrew Bible explains in precise terms) that they were Earthlings.
Around 6,000 years ago, Adam and Eve (known then as Atâbba and Kâva - and jointly called the Adâma) were purpose-bred for kingship by Enki and his sister-wife Nîn-khursag. This took place at a 'creation chamber' which the Sumerian annals refer to as the House of Shi-im-tî (meaning 'breath‹wind‹life' ).
Adam and Eve were certainly not the first people on Earth, but they were the first of the genetically contrived kingly succession. The records tell that Nîn-khursag was called the Lady of the Embryo or the Lady of Life, and she was the surrogate mother for Atâbba and Kâva, who were created from human ova fertilized by the Lord Enki.
It was because of Nîn-khursag's title, Nîn-tî (meaning Lady of Life), that Kâva was later given the same distinction by the Hebrews. Indeed, the name Kâva (Ava or Eve) was subsequently said to mean 'life'.
Both Enki and Nîn-khursag (along with their brother Enlil) belonged to a pantheon of gods and goddesses referred to as the Anunnaki which, in Sumerian, means 'Heaven came to Earth' (An-unna-ki). In fact, the Grand Assembly of the Anunnaki (later called the Court of the Elohim) is actually mentioned in the Old Testament's Psalm No. 82, wherein Jehovah makes his bid for supreme power over the other gods.
According to tradition, the importance of Cain was that he was directly produced by Enki and Kâva, so his blood was three-quarters Anunnaki, while his half-brothers, Hevel and Satânael (better known as Abel and Seth), were less than half Anunnaki, being the offspring of Atâbba and Kâva (Adam and Eve).
Cain's Anunnaki blood was so advanced that it was said that his brother Abel's blood was earthbound by comparison. It was related in the scriptures that Cain 'rose far above Abel', so that his brother's blood was swallowed into the ground - but this original description was thoroughly misinterpreted for the modern Bible, which now claims that Cain 'rose up against Abel' and spilled his blood upon the ground. This is not the same thing at all.
2006-12-10 18:37:43 · 13 answers · asked by fuck 3 in Religion & Spirituality
2006-12-10 18:35:52 · 16 answers · asked by Sara 5 in Religion & Spirituality
He made his money as a research officer on some visit to the North Pole, or could have been the South.He now dabbles in Modern Art and reckons that as it thaws it will, and I quote 'show a direct correlation between how the Polar Ice caps are being destroyed by toxic waste'
I think that it will just make my backyard smell and attract flies. Worst still my favourite Auntie is coming to visit on the day he wants to show his 'Art'
What do I do?
2006-12-10 18:34:41 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Etiquette
I'm a christian man, i got a girlfriend, so i'm trying not to think about sex and perverted things, but i can't seem to quit. Even when she's just in her shorts, i feel turned on. I hope i hear from someone who knows what i'm talking about...
2006-12-10 18:33:50 · 22 answers · asked by cupofjoe_84 1 in Religion & Spirituality
I don't know-the director(s) strategically place the cameras where it just looks extremely sensual...LOL....
2006-12-10 18:33:20 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
In the Treaty of Tripoli, drafted in 1796 under George Washington and signed by John Adams in 1797, in Article 11, it states:
"As the Government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Musselmen; and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."
Also, the original Pledge of Allegiance didn't contain the words "under God". The congress voted to include that in 1954 during the McCarthy era.
To declare the US was founded as a Christian nation shows ignorance and no research done on behalf in finding out the truth and not relying on what you've been told!
2006-12-10 18:33:02 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Religion & Spirituality
Questions asked on 10 December 2006:
Showing 331 to 360 of 2358 questions
Questions asked on other days: