Adam & Eve part three?

Question

Few people ever think to enquire about the supposed enemies of Cain as defined in Genesis. Who could they possibly have been? Where would they have come from? According to the Bible only Adam and Eve, along with Cain and Abel, existed - and Cain had apparently killed Abel. Therefore, if one accepts the text as it stands, there was no one around to be Cain's enemy!


The Sumerian Gra-al was an emblem dignified as the Dew Cup. It was identified in all records (including those of Egypt, Phoenicia and the Hebrew annals) as being an upright, centred red cross within a circle - and has long been recognized as the original symbol of the Holy Grail.


Another anomaly is presented soon afterwards in Genesis when we are told that Cain found himself a wife. Who on earth were her parents if Adam and Eve were the only couple alive? Then, without confronting this anomaly at all, Genesis lists the names of Cain's descendants.


It becomes clear from all this that some very important information has been edited from the Old Testament narrative. Plainly, there were plenty of other people around at the time, and it is not difficult to find their stories outside the Bible.


In order to further enhance the historical succession from Cain, he was married to his half-sister, a pure-bred Anunnaki princess called Luluwa. Her father was Enki and her mother was Lilith, a granddaughter of Enlil. Although not giving the name of Cain's wife, the Bible does name their younger son Enoch, while the Sumerian records cite his elder son and kingly successor Atûn, who is perhaps better known as King Etâna of Kish.


Etâna was said to have 'walked with the gods' and was fed from the Plant of Birth (the Tree of Life as it is called in Genesis). Henceforth, the kings of the line were designated as being the twigs of the Tree - and the ancient word for twig was 'klon' (clone). In later times, this plant or tree was redefined as a vine - and so the Graal, the Vine and the Messianic Bloodline became entwined in the Holy Grail literature of subsequent ages.


By virtue of their contrived breeding, this kingly succession was modelled specifically for leadership and, in all aspects of knowledge, culture, awareness, wisdom and intuition, they were highly advanced against their mundane contemporaries. In order to keep their blood as pure as possible, they always married within a close kinship, for it was fully recognized that the prominent gene of the succession was carried within the blood of the mother. Today we call this the mitochondrial DNA.


And so was born a tradition inherited by their kingly descendants in Egypt, and by the later Celtic rulers of Europe. True kingship, it was maintained, was transferred through the female and kingly marriages were, therefore, strategically cemented with maternal half-sisters or matrilinear first cousins.

http://graal.co.uk/index.html

Answer 1

Mito-what?
I like how you've put in the origins of words. For the most part, approximately 10% of language is lost every 1000 years. I've often thought that there are kingly people living amoung us, I mean, consider the implications of what you are saying! The Amazon has spoken!

Getting to the true history is difficult For instance, the story of the Amazon has been so outrageously exaggerated that I can only laugh. Greeks are stupid! (Or whoever thought women couldn't fight a battle.) It had nothing to do with sexual domination at all. It had everything to do with protecting the land. The word "Amazon" means "breastless"

Answer 2

I'm not going to read all that; your writing style is not reader-friendly, and that is being generous. Maybe if you write in pig Latin, you could be understood.

As to the question about where the other people came from, why does it necessarily have to be an edit? Maybe the only reason we see Adam and Eve's story is because they were the first created, and the one's that fell. If you look at any historical recount, only the people who are important to the story are included, and their history from birth is not usually recounted, especially if the narrative is subject-oriented.

As to the rest of your question, I didn't read it. Thanks for the headache.

Answer 3

remember this the OT scripture never says it is the complete story, or that it should be considered as limiting in any way, it simply is the transcription of a vision, and not even the total transcription as u point out.

Answer 4

yeah the fact that the bible says that cain had enemies almost right after he killed his brother kinda shows the bible has mistakes or really isnt true because no one else existed yet. his enimies were the monkeys that evolved lol i guess

Answer 5

For the first part of this..Adam and Eve were the first that God created..it never stated that God never created others, but we are led to believe that their were others that God created..
as for the rest..it's too long..and I'm tired..
Blessings

Answer 6

Nut case-gime dem points

Answer 7

You had me going there for a second. I actually thought this stuff might be real.
I Cr 13;8a
12-10-6

Answer 8

Vague. Please can you try to read the portion of the Bible you read again. Also ask God to grant you the grace to understand.

Answer 9

Should really post the site you got it from http://search.netcenter.netscape.com/nctr/boomframe.jsp?query=Jesus+was+not+from+Adam+and+Eve%27s+son+Seth+at+all.+It+descended+from+Eve%27s+son+Cain.&page=1&offset=0&result_url=redir%3Fsrc%3Dwebsearch%26requestId%3Dcf1f4b1012d142a4%26clickedItemRank%3D1%26userQuery%3DJesus%2Bwas%2Bnot%2Bfrom%2BAdam%2Band%2BEve%2527s%2Bson%2BSeth%2Bat%2Ball.%2BIt%2Bdescended%2Bfrom%2BEve%2527s%2Bson%2BCain.%26clickedItemURN%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.graal.co.uk%252Fgenesislecture.html%26invocationType%3D-%26fromPage%3DNCTRBoom%26amp%3BampTest%3D1&remove_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.graal.co.uk%2Fgenesislecture.html

It's much prettier than this nasty green border

Answer 10

Still not reading it.

God bless,
Stanbo