English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The first king of the Messianic succession was the biblical Cain, head of the Sumerian House of Kish. On recognizing this, one can immediately see an early anomaly in the traditional Genesis story, for the historical line to David and Jesus was not from Adam and Eve's son Seth at all. It descended from Eve's son Cain.


Conventional teaching generally cites Cain as being the first son of Adam and Eve - but he was not; even the book of Genesis tells us that he was not. In fact, it confirms how Eve told Adam that Cain's father was the Lord - who was of course Enki the archetype. Even outside the Bible, the writings of the Hebrew Talmud and Midrash make it quite plain that, although Cain was Eve's eldest son, he was not the son of Adam.


The Old Testament book of Genesis (in its translated form) tells us that Cain was 'a tiller of the ground' - but this is not what the original text relates. What it states is that Cain had 'dominion over the earth', which is a rather different matter when considering his kingly status.


The Bible translators appear to have had a constant problem with the word 'earth' - often translating it to ground, clay or dust, instead of recognizing it as relating to the Earth. Even in the case of Adam and Eve, the translators made glaring errors. The Bible says, 'Male and female created he them, and he called their name Adam'. Older writings use the more complete word Adâma, which means 'of the Earth'. However, this did not mean they were made of dirt; it means (as the Anchor Hebrew Bible explains in precise terms) that they were Earthlings.


Around 6,000 years ago, Adam and Eve (known then as Atâbba and Kâva - and jointly called the Adâma) were purpose-bred for kingship by Enki and his sister-wife Nîn-khursag. This took place at a 'creation chamber' which the Sumerian annals refer to as the House of Shi-im-tî (meaning 'breath‹wind‹life' ).


Adam and Eve were certainly not the first people on Earth, but they were the first of the genetically contrived kingly succession. The records tell that Nîn-khursag was called the Lady of the Embryo or the Lady of Life, and she was the surrogate mother for Atâbba and Kâva, who were created from human ova fertilized by the Lord Enki.


It was because of Nîn-khursag's title, Nîn-tî (meaning Lady of Life), that Kâva was later given the same distinction by the Hebrews. Indeed, the name Kâva (Ava or Eve) was subsequently said to mean 'life'.


Both Enki and Nîn-khursag (along with their brother Enlil) belonged to a pantheon of gods and goddesses referred to as the Anunnaki which, in Sumerian, means 'Heaven came to Earth' (An-unna-ki). In fact, the Grand Assembly of the Anunnaki (later called the Court of the Elohim) is actually mentioned in the Old Testament's Psalm No. 82, wherein Jehovah makes his bid for supreme power over the other gods.


According to tradition, the importance of Cain was that he was directly produced by Enki and Kâva, so his blood was three-quarters Anunnaki, while his half-brothers, Hevel and Satânael (better known as Abel and Seth), were less than half Anunnaki, being the offspring of Atâbba and Kâva (Adam and Eve).


Cain's Anunnaki blood was so advanced that it was said that his brother Abel's blood was earthbound by comparison. It was related in the scriptures that Cain 'rose far above Abel', so that his brother's blood was swallowed into the ground - but this original description was thoroughly misinterpreted for the modern Bible, which now claims that Cain 'rose up against Abel' and spilled his blood upon the ground. This is not the same thing at all.

2006-12-10 18:37:43 · 13 answers · asked by fuck 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

13 answers

Wow, I kind of like that story. Anunnaki sounds like "Anakin" from that movie, and it reminds me of the history of the solar system, for once, long ago, there were two suns here. Most star systems are binary, and to have one sun is unusual. I theorize that there was another planet where the asteroid belt is, and it was torn apart by the forces of the two stars, subsequently, the life on this planet was set back when a great disaster occured in the prehistorical times. The verdant greenery and marshy conditions of Earth back then could easily have been caused by abundance of sunlight, which occured at certain times of the year...but I digress. Where did you dig this story up? I thought the Library of Alexandria burnt down long ago...

2006-12-10 18:48:45 · answer #1 · answered by Shinigami 7 · 1 1

And where did you get this gibberish from.the name of Cain means (hater) as he hated his twin sister luluwa(beautiful) while in the womb.Then ADAM and EVE had Abel and his twin sister Aklemia.and then a single child Seth.
Cain married his twin sister and moved away from Adam and EVE.After he killed Abel.and stayed apart from the main family ever after.
Adam had Seth marry Abels twin sister.
After ADAMS death Seth severed the children of Cain from the family and Cain and his family went down and dwelt westward below the place where he had killed Able out of jealousy.
Seth and his children dwelt northward upon the mountian of the cave of treasures to be near their father ADAM.Seth had been made the head of the tribe.
I have yet to see a copy of the modern Bible that says differently.
Not even the Koran.Nor the Torah.

2006-12-10 19:28:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

This "question" has no actual connection with the bible or with Jehovah's Witnesses.

Learn more:
http://watchtower.org/e/20000622/article_03.htm
http://watchtower.org/e/20010801/
http://watchtower.org/e/jt/

2006-12-11 02:33:41 · answer #3 · answered by achtung_heiss 7 · 2 0

Boy, You really swallowed that one hook line and sinker! Satan really has his hook in you, but big time! I have read all that before and I know it to be 250 lbs. of wet horse manure in a 5 lbs. bag. But at the least you got all of your non-facts straight, I will give you that much.

2006-12-10 18:51:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Hear Hear!

Pass the scotch.

2006-12-10 18:52:15 · answer #5 · answered by Voodoid 7 · 0 1

you are so full of yourself the only thing you have shown us with this question is you are trying to impress us with your knowledge but you know its all your opinion and yours alone please find a life with a cause not hatred you need to read some more two maybe the comics it may be more at your level

2006-12-10 18:50:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

I hope you realise that not many people read such long questions!

2006-12-10 18:43:16 · answer #7 · answered by -♦One-♦-Love♦- 7 · 1 1

This folklore I do not believe

2006-12-10 19:03:13 · answer #8 · answered by akband 4 · 1 0

It will take hundred hours to understand your explanation! Why can't you make it brief?

2006-12-10 18:41:15 · answer #9 · answered by SESHADRI K 6 · 2 2

and your question was cuz I frget now

2006-12-10 19:15:49 · answer #10 · answered by icheeknows 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers