Why did he surround himself with idiots (the NT portrays the appostles as stumbling, unbelieving idiots), then appoint James as his successor. THEN, the appoints Paul as his OTHER successor, gives him a very different Gospel to teach. I mean, Paul and James are diametrically opposed (if you read the Clementine, they are trying to have each other killed.)
What James was teaching (as near as we can tell) was a lot closer to what Jesus was originally reaching. Why does Paul need to extrapolate so much? Why didn't Jesus simply teach what he wanted? Why did he withold from his apostles and give secret knowledge to Paul. Why did he give an incomplete message to his people (the Jews) and give a complete message to people that he refered to as dogs (gentiles.)
If he wanted a separate message for the Jews, didn't he realize that James and his followers would soon be wiped out by the Romans? Isn't he omniscient?
I'm confused.
2006-08-28
08:23:33
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality