English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 13 September 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

2007-09-13 15:22:26 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or would you die to protect them?

(Your answer to this question will determine how patriotic you really are. A true American would NEVER, EVER, EVER compromise his or her liberties, for ANY reason.)

2007-09-13 15:11:40 · 35 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6

It is assumed that rich people especially celebrites support the Democrats and liberal views while the Republicans are supported my middle class working familes. Can anyone clarify this.

2007-09-13 15:05:38 · 15 answers · asked by Rongfred K 1

Found this question in a friend’s blog and thought I should ask.

2007-09-13 15:02:29 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

Many people on here, like me, are sick and tired of people claiming the Patriot Act is a huge attack on our personal rights. So, which rights have we lost exactly? Cause I personally have not been affected by them. I don't talk to terrorists on my phone nor am I an enemy combatant fighting against our military personal.

So please, explain this to me, cause I guess I'm just ignorant.

2007-09-13 15:01:31 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

9/13/2007

Did you watch the speech?
I skipped it. (I'm in a fairly good mood too.) :)
Are people liking it?

Any golden nuggets?
Anything maybe you didn't expect that now maybe doesn't seem so bad?

If you disagree(d) with him, do you feel he is listening to you and the rest of America a little better?

Does he have the magic faith? The magic confidence that will save us in time?

Maybe he Sounded good? You liked his tone? He sounded a little more sensibly-spoken? Or that he really worked on getting himself to sound mature, sensible tone.. like I saw him do at least once or twice(around March 2005) ?

2007-09-13 15:00:44 · 9 answers · asked by roostershine 4

Do you think Gore and Kerry could have done any better with 9/11, Afghanistan and Iraq? Wonder what their approval rating would be about now? How many of you BUSH haters would be blasting them also? I would say about 99 percent although I am sure the Liberals and others will say they would have supported them. Welcome to Fantasyland!

Truth is no one, not even Bush, could have handled this situation right because it was "unknown" territory. The man will be gone in a year..LET IT GO ALREADY. Soon you can start "hating" on the new President. Thanks and have a great day!

2007-09-13 15:00:44 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous

In time they will be this and in time they will be that, didn't he really mean "in time" when somebody else takes care of it?

2007-09-13 14:55:35 · 6 answers · asked by Enigma 6

It seems that no matter what President Bush says in his addresses, the democratic congress is armed with dissent. Is there anything they can agree on?

2007-09-13 14:50:41 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

so when will Bush serve there....?

2007-09-13 14:49:58 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

"The insurgents who threaten Iraq's future are a danger to U.S. national security."

Is our national security now totally dependent upon whether or not Iraq becomes a stable democracy?

Because if it is... buy your freaking burkhas now. That country will NEVER be stable.

2007-09-13 14:44:36 · 12 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6

What's all this about an illegal war?

2007-09-13 14:35:47 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

The quislings and cowards of the (defunct) Democrat Party are a wholly owned subsidiary of DreamWorks pictures. That is indisputable. The Hollywood communist mafia who are choosing the Democrat nominee for president have promoted filthy, filthy, filthy girls as role models for America's youth. Do they honestly believe their actions will be without consequence? Even negatively effecting to their own offspring eventually?

2007-09-13 14:30:22 · 18 answers · asked by reaganite27 5

Because the Iraqis want us there due to regional instability?

2007-09-13 14:21:53 · 19 answers · asked by oohhbother 7

proudly post all the pictures of her they stash under the bed and declare how much they always wanted and supported her?

2007-09-13 14:21:40 · 14 answers · asked by Your Teeth or Mine? 5

He made some good points. Did he change your views on the Iraq War?

2007-09-13 14:20:11 · 7 answers · asked by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1

2007-09-13 14:14:29 · 6 answers · asked by Rabia^_^ 3

Same-on same-o
Guess that is all that is left for a Lame Duck.

2007-09-13 14:12:32 · 30 answers · asked by rare2findd 6

If Hillary were President and we were attacked by another country, such that they actually captured significant land in California and Washington state, would Hillary be likely to say something like:

"We will commit with all of our military might and the will of the American people for a period of 12 months to liberate and restore those lands wrongly taken. If we can't do it within that time frame, I will run up the white flag and withdraw all troops and poop be on those Americans we did not liberate."

Any thoughts? Additions?

2007-09-13 13:59:34 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-13 13:59:22 · 6 answers · asked by RedWhite&Blue 4

So he can pass it on to the next president?

2007-09-13 13:54:40 · 8 answers · asked by Enigma 6

Democrats weren't alone in questioning General Betrayus's take on the war.

So why attack Clinton? Why not attack Senator Warner and those handful of Republicans who grilled the general?

Or is there a double-standard when it comes to politics and party loyalty--with the GOP?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070913/ap_on_el_pr/giuliani_clinton

2007-09-13 13:29:27 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-13 13:26:22 · 22 answers · asked by American Sunshine 3

TEXAS CITY, Texas - Two sergeants who helped write a New York Times op-ed article sharply critical of the Pentagon's assessment of the Iraq war were killed in a Baghdad crash this week, and one grieving mother wants the Army to explain their deaths.
Another co-author, Staff Sgt. Jeremy Murphy, was shot in the head Aug. 12 while the op-ed was being written.

The Times piece, called "The War As We Saw It," expressed doubts about American gains in Iraq. "To believe that Americans, with an occupying force that long ago outlived its reluctant welcome, can win over a recalcitrant local population and win this counterinsurgency is far-fetched," the group wrote.

2007-09-13 13:24:56 · 12 answers · asked by oohhbother 7

I believe at least once, President Bush said something to the effect of "I don't do much reading" or "I don't read much" and also "I don't read newspapers" etc. I'm NOT trying to bash Bush in this post. Instead, what I DO want is a link to a reliable online news source or blog or transcript or anything that has this statement documented so I can reference it. Could anyone PLEASE help?

2007-09-13 13:24:15 · 9 answers · asked by The Doctor 3

I am one of those unpatriotics. I knew Bush wasn't being honest with We The People when he began the invasion. I knew it was to put us in a strategic positon in the Middle East. Now I'm questioning how much of this has to do with Israel. Where better to go with this then my buddies at YA.

2007-09-13 13:22:04 · 8 answers · asked by gone 7

6 months ago the anti Bush group said we reserve judgment until we hear from the GENERAL.Well a week before the report was even given some of those same people called it a lie.So much for waiting until it was presented to Congress.What is wrong with waiting until you talk to the author before making a judgement.I thought that was what hearings were for . What about reserving judgement untill All the facts are in. Is that asking to much?? Oh yes , I am niether a Democrat or Republican. I am a Independent thinker & voter

2007-09-13 13:17:11 · 9 answers · asked by BUTCH 5

fedest.com, questions and answers