The quislings and cowards of the (defunct) Democrat Party are a wholly owned subsidiary of DreamWorks pictures. That is indisputable. The Hollywood communist mafia who are choosing the Democrat nominee for president have promoted filthy, filthy, filthy girls as role models for America's youth. Do they honestly believe their actions will be without consequence? Even negatively effecting to their own offspring eventually?
2007-09-13 14:30:22 · 18 answers · asked by reaganite27 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1239529/posts
Who do you think Paris Hilton was campaigning for Tiko? Think about it. Don't be an ideologue.
2007-09-13 14:41:43 · update #1
Old School ~ Are you Old School enough to remember February 1917 in St. Petersburg?
2007-09-13 15:03:31 · update #2
oldschool ~ No it would not be August 14; the date I stated is correct.
2007-09-14 07:07:20 · update #3
Didn't Britney Spears campaign for Bush his first term? Why yes...yes she did. It was around the same time she did that Pepsi commercial with Bob Dole. I don't remember any of the other women you mentioned talking about politics. And as far as puppets go, I wonder what Karl Rove will do after he has abandoned his. (puppet that is)
2007-09-21 09:58:17 · answer #1 · answered by Penny K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what about Schwarzenegger?
i don't think the abovementioned celebrities have a whole lot to do with politics. i would be more worried about Hollywood's involvement with Scientology than the Democratic party. It's not like Dreamworks, or any other production company sought the whorest of the whores for promotion purposes. Remember that Lohan, Hilton, Richie, and Spears were kids once and weren't born slutty. They are products of their environments, not products a political agenda.
2007-09-20 05:49:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Clearly they are 4 grown human women, without a full brain or moral between them. It's unkind, but their ultimate self-destruction may be a relief.
As for your perception of the "Hollywood Communist Mafia," everything you wrote sounds very, very paranoid.
*Edit 1*
Reaganite: Wouldn't that be AUGUST 1914 in St. Petersburg? Just for the record, I came into this cesspool of a world in 1954. Funny you should ask about St. Petersburg in 1914, as I'm currently reading "The Last Days of Imperial Russia" by Miriam Kochan. That's right: no MTV videos or Ipods for me-certainly not the superficial creatures your generation has been brainwashed into worshipping-only the real thing will do for me ;-)
2007-09-13 14:36:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of the 4 people you mentioned....two are spoiled hollywood brats...the other two are popular because society MADE them. If no one had ever went to their movie or concert or patronized anything that they were associated with, they would not be what they are but would be just ordinary citizens. It's funny to hear these thoughts coming from someone who calls himself a "Reagonite" when it was Reagan I believe who made the statement that "Profit is not a dirty word"...and isn't that what Hollywood is all about? making a profit?? When Americans wake up and stop patronizing the so called "entertainment" coming out of Hollywood, maybe they will clean up their act. As you seem to zero in on the "filthy" girls....how do you feel about all the violence coming out of Hollywood?
2007-09-21 02:58:33 · answer #4 · answered by Becca 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Elite? What does Hollywood have to do with politics? What does those skanks have to do with many artists? That'll be like comparing Limbaugh with many good people who are conservatives, is not a fair comparison. I'm a libertarian and I seriously don't understand how you can make the connection between Hollywood and Democrats. Get real, you sound very ignorant.
2007-09-13 15:18:05 · answer #5 · answered by cynical 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You might want to try a decaffinated brand.
As for Paris and Lindsay 'ruling' our political opinions...please! The only ones that pay attention to these women are teenaged girls with too much time on thier hands. Let them be as active as they want to be...they can't hurt anything.
2007-09-13 14:34:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Someone should really tell you the difference between politics and entertainment. No one can be taken seriously who thinks Paris Hilton is a political figure.
2007-09-13 14:33:59 · answer #7 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The liberal elite media are definitely not thinking "sugar plums and all things nice."
Does anybody in the Republican part of America really care about Britney, Paris, Linday, and Nicole? I don't!!!
2007-09-13 14:38:01 · answer #8 · answered by D.A. S 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lindsay is going to die first, she's idiotic. definite, i think of britney could desire to unfastened her little ones.. that's obtrusive that she does not care lots for them. i certainly don't have something against Paris & Nicole..
2016-12-16 19:32:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not sure what the liberals think but i know how the Conservative think of their own puppets ... you know the so called educated: Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus and Jerry Lewis ... to name some.
After all one is a drug addict, the other a racist and the last one a homophobes ... where s the big deal? really!
2007-09-13 14:39:08 · answer #10 · answered by caliguy_30 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋