Democrats weren't alone in questioning General Betrayus's take on the war.
So why attack Clinton? Why not attack Senator Warner and those handful of Republicans who grilled the general?
Or is there a double-standard when it comes to politics and party loyalty--with the GOP?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070913/ap_on_el_pr/giuliani_clinton
2007-09-13 13:29:27 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not really. Giuliani is simply a hard core arrogant bully just like Bush is. He still think that the only solution in Iraq is to bull ride a cavalry across town and wipe it off clean. When will these morons realize that force will never solve Iraq's problems. The report of Petraeus is not a wrong one, but i do believe it plays in Bush advantage. Whenever you start a broad action like the one started a few month ago in Iraq it is bound to get some positive result ... does that mean the whole picture is a success? NO does it mean we have made some progress here and there? YES ... problem is when we clean an area and leave for another one the first one falls back to what it was and that is when the Democrats and many republicans say ENOUGH, when will Iraqi military and police force take control ... heck it is their country still isn't it?
2007-09-13 13:37:50 · answer #1 · answered by caliguy_30 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Why do you make word plays with his name and not Hillary's?
Besides, his "compatriarchs" have no integrity to question.
2007-09-13 20:33:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
to cause damage and get some of her potential votes
2007-09-13 20:44:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋