Found this question in a friend’s blog and thought I should ask.
2007-09-13 15:02:29 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That depends on the change. I agree, change is needed. If that change includes increasing the size of government, robbing from Peter to pay Paul, overlooking the fact that many programs are out there that are paid for by tax money and they aren't working and instead of fixing problems, throw more money at it........... That type of 'change' isn't what this country needs.
We need to downsize government, not increase it. We need to quit allowing big business to monopolize so that competition and choice is available to all of us. We need to do something about our borders, we need to deal with immigration, we need to revamp our social security system, we need to look into other ways dealing with our health care system so that everyone can get taken care of, without taxing ourselves to death, and of course, the voters need to educate themselves and realize that there are many representatives on both sides who don't give a damn about us because, they've sold out. Vote them out of office!
I could write a book and I know that you could also. Hillary, is not the answer and by no means the 'change' that this country needs.
(Your inspiration, I believe).. :)
2007-09-13 23:08:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Of course change is needed; countries, like everything else, must adapt to a changing atmosphere in order to survive. I don't think any political figure could win a nomination, even for the Republican party, by stating that things should be kept exactly the way they are. Whether or not Hillary's idea of change is what this country needs is a totally different question.
2007-09-13 15:13:52 · answer #2 · answered by Lambert Lewis Strether 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We need a change all right but not the one Hillary has in mind. This country needs to purge congress of all the cowards that are chasing people around for immoral sex. Perhaps it was Billy Boy Clinton that set the example for all the activities. He was so busy hunting down victims that the terrorist felt safe in attacking us. Although Bush was president when 911 happened it was Clinton that caused it. Not taking Osama out when He had the chance opened the floodgate of attacks on us. Now Hillary wants to have a chance at causing even more harm to this country.
2007-09-13 15:09:08 · answer #3 · answered by mr conservative 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
A change to grow is always necessary. However the types of changes that Hillary is expounding are absolutely not where we want to go.; Her changes require that we become socialists with big government dictating what are needs are. We would be subject to universal health care. Suffice it to say she would not avail herself to this health care system. Let's start with one of the changes, and that is for Hillary to quit renting property to the secret service, for protecting her, at the rate of $10,000.00 a month, BTW that is what her mortgage payment is on the house in NY state. We need less big government in our lives, not more. Change is good if we go in the right direction.
2007-09-13 23:26:37 · answer #4 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The changes Hillary seeks about imposing will take this country back 25 years. As in what it was like in Russia when they were about to fall.
Money was scarce, food was scarce and people were up in arms about their government not doing a thing to improve their lifestyle.
Hillary more or less wants to limit our lifestyle.
Her meaning of growth in this country means to tax, rape and pillage as much money out of one person's pocket in order to make everyone equal.
A society does not, and can not function with everyone being equal.
2007-09-14 01:02:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Change is needed but Hillary is not the one to do it. We need someone who is a risk taker and thinks beyond conventional wisdom. That type of person would never get elected because We Americans are not ready for that.
2007-09-13 15:12:51 · answer #6 · answered by gnatlord 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Change is critical to this countries survival after it has been brought to its knees by an immoral, gustopo fool..
Hillary would offer some change but not enough.. She sold out her base, voted for the war and continued to vote to support the war...
Obama would offer moderate change but it might take him a year or so to get acclimated.
Kucinich and Ron Paul would offer the most and best change for this country.. But people are too stupid to get it.. Maybe ignorance is what we should be changing...
2007-09-13 15:12:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't think Hillary is the one to do it. She couldn't make a healthcare plan work the first time around. Real change will come from a second tier candidate probably from either party. Don't buy in to that BS from the corporate puppets.
2007-09-13 15:12:40 · answer #8 · answered by Enigma 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
She doesn't want to change anything! I'm sure that if she is elected nothing will change because she is in bed with the corrupt lobbyists and cares more about a $5 bill then she does any American citizen. She is toxic and I would rather have any other democrat as president(and some republicans) over her.
2007-09-13 15:11:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
We need to change some things. And getting Hillary back into the whitehouse is not one of the things.
2007-09-13 15:08:40 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋