Politics - 13 September 2007

Doesn't that actually mean we are back to square one?

2007-09-13 13:15:14 · 17 answers · asked by Enigma 6

Do they have the right to expect that the civilian leadership will not put them in harm's way unless it is absolutely necessary? I think Bush broke this trust, with his discretionary war in Iraq.

2007-09-13 13:12:45 · 9 answers · asked by arvis3 4

Which word sounds better and is correct.

2007-09-13 13:10:55 · 11 answers · asked by emily 1

on Glen Beck today he ran a parody where in a familiar telecaster voice talks abut Hope, the democrats message of Hope, Hope that we fail in Iraq, Hope that another Republican sex scandal will happen tomorrow, Hope that the economy will bottom out... and then he comes in laughing saying isn't it true ..isn't it true??...
well Glen, and the rest of you sleeping potato heads.. it is all true..all of it,
Iraq is a miserable and disgusting travesty..
Been watchin the stock market guys, ..oh and how about the value of the greenback over the last "5" years?
Sex scandals.. Bill O' had his own or did you all forget?????
Dirty Money, Blood for Oil, flagrant deviant behavior....
Don't even say Barney Frank or Bill Clinton... that shite is old fellas, really old...



What is wrong with you people????????? seriously

2007-09-13 13:08:52 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Because he started a fake war for the cartel boys profits as we lose ground. The economy is based on the debt we owe so dont try that bull.

2007-09-13 13:04:35 · 9 answers · asked by bushcrimeboss 2

cuz G.W. is about to spread some manure on us again

2007-09-13 12:50:35 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Maybe our Country would be better off if our -great- politicians had to send their kids off to war first.

2007-09-13 12:50:21 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why is it so unreasonable to expect that Bush or Rumsfeld might have planned what would happen after Saddam's government fell?

2007-09-13 12:50:07 · 13 answers · asked by arvis3 4

Like ".....we are in Iraq so they won't ride camels into Jew York..."

or

"....The rich people should be able to keep their money with the help of the US government...."

2007-09-13 12:48:03 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-13 12:45:03 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

Never a story from Fox or any conservative paper. Just AP and CNN. You'd almost believe the Presidential candicy is between Obama and Hilary. Moveon.org is the Gestapo news media. It's so funny how liberals are only liberal when you agree with them. If you have your own ideas or opinions your called facisist, communist, or just a plain flat pig. Get in a argument with a liberal and see who starts the name calling.

2007-09-13 12:44:43 · 15 answers · asked by ggarytthompson 1

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program. We want to seriously reduce his capacity to threaten his neighbors".

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/02/17/transcripts/clinton.iraq/

2007-09-13 12:39:23 · 17 answers · asked by Curtis 6

I personally believe that you don't run for prez, unless you really do have good intentions. I mean lets be honest the job cant be fun, you always have half the nation hating you, you get paid crap, and your stuck with S.S. for the rest of your life, and no one in your family will ever have a normal life. Yet people believe that the prez ...what wants all the oil..why... so when his term is over he can make sure there is enough gas to fill up the family ecslade?

2007-09-13 12:38:55 · 5 answers · asked by Ellis! 2

I said slavery was the ultimate cause of the Civil War. I then provided Civil War era documents proving southern states left the union because of slavery. They even stated so in their "Declaration of Secession" documents.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ai_4v9xhy_ByrvBDkjzwA3_Y7BR.;_ylv=3?qid=20070913160244AApBKAp

Had the southern pro-slavery candidate won the election of 1860, the South would not have seceeded.

"State-rights" is just an excuse southerners use when they are out of national power. Once they have it, they go about destroying it. Modern example: Bush ran on state rights in 2000, but has since used the power of the federal government to oppose California's medical marijuana laws, Oregon's right to die laws, and Massachusetts gay marriage laws.

2007-09-13 12:29:31 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

or is being a patriot not what you wear and show on the outside but rather the content of your character and how you feel about what the United States of American really stands for?

2007-09-13 12:28:11 · 16 answers · asked by ballerb j 1

2007-09-13 12:26:01 · 16 answers · asked by GOD'S IN HEAVEN'S FAV 1

Other than Hitler...I mean.

2007-09-13 12:23:42 · 15 answers · asked by ballerb j 1

2007-09-13 12:20:35 · 19 answers · asked by Silver Spoon 4

I think it happened when Bush refused to do anything diplomatic to help end the war in victory.

2007-09-13 12:14:50 · 29 answers · asked by easy_game_101 2

While you guys have opinions from revisionist confederate historians, I have civil war era documents stating otherwise.

The South seceeded from the Union because they wanted to keep their slaves. That was the ultimate cause of the Civil War.

=================
DECLARATION OF SECESSION, MISSISSIPPI
"In the momentous step which our State has taken of dissolving its connection with the government of which we so long formed a part, it is but just that we should declare the prominent reasons which have induced our course."

"Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun.
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/csa/missec.htm

2007-09-13 12:02:44 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

We all love our troops, no matter what party we hail from. What we have is a difference of opinion on how those troops are being used by our government.

For the conservatives: Give the troops a little credit. They are smart enough to realize that dissent at home about our mission doesn't mean we don't care about them or the fine work they do as asked. Stop accusing liberals of not supporting or caring about the troops - they do, just as much as you do.

For liberals: The conservatives love the troops too. They believe in Bush's mission so not bringing them home en masse doesn't reflect on how they feel about the troops personally. Most of them aren't facists intent on destroying our country, they are just convinced we're doing the right thing.

I wish we could all talk more civilly about it. Without all the condemnation/mud slinging/name calling. I'm tired of seeing the troops being used like a push pull toy. Who cares the most? It's not a contest, we ALL care.

2007-09-13 12:00:42 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I read comments every single day from liberals and democrats who say that Bush is an idiot, a chump, a chimp, a moron, and a dumbasss. And that's just the tip of the ice berg!

BUT THEN you same people accuse him stealing the 2000 elections, stealing the 2004 election, planning the 911 attacks, tricking the entire US government into funding an illegal war in Iraq, and all to make money off of Haliburton kickbacks! Sounds pretty elaborate for somebody who's supposed to be such an idiot!

So which is it liberals? Is Bush the idiot you accuse him of being? Or is he the greatest genius in the world for pulling off the biggest conspiracy in the history of mankind?

(I realize some of you will insist that Bush is dumb, and that he simply surrounded himself with smart people. Okay. Let's suppose he did. Does that sound dumb to you?)

2007-09-13 11:58:14 · 30 answers · asked by ? 5

I'm just curious. What is it that Democrats hope to achieve? What are their values? What would the perfect world look like for the average Democrat?

2007-09-13 11:47:42 · 20 answers · asked by thealligator414 3

2007-09-13 11:42:32 · 27 answers · asked by Anti theist 5

2007-09-13 11:42:16 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

the majority of those serving in Iraq believe that this is a just war and we are doing the right thing and makig progress?

2007-09-13 11:36:21 · 30 answers · asked by Rick 5

When did we EVER have to "fight them here"? A terrorist attack is not the same thing as a military invasion - there IS no way to "fight" it. It's over in - I don't know, how long does it take a plane to fly into a building and explode?

2007-09-13 11:28:15 · 32 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6

Don't real southerners want their own country anyway so they can fly their confederate flag?

Today's southern based GOP candidates refuse to condemn (which does not equal ban) the confederate flag
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007May11/0,4670,ConfederateFlagPolitics,00.html

2007-09-13 11:27:56 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Oh ,ho ho , I believe they certainly do . But they acknowledge that .
I'm not talking about forcing anything on them , instead I'm talking about them honoring their debts .

Who believes Iraq owes us a huge debt ?

2007-09-13 11:26:05 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-13 11:25:56 · 18 answers · asked by Edge Caliber 6