.....A 20,000 or more troop 'surge'. 132,000 already there; (more than half oif those troops are for support and maintenance); 3,000 US troops dead; 30,000 injured since the war began.
Isn't Bush just replacing troops either deceased or unable to fight anymore? (And yes, this is a serious question. Even with this 'surge,' there will still be no more troops than at the beginning of the war, will there?) If I am wrong, correct me.
2007-01-10
05:35:10
·
8 answers
·
asked by
rare2findd
6