Military - July 2006

I THINK IT IS REALLY UNFAIR TO DESTROY TOWNS AND TO KILLL UNARMED PEOPLE SLEEPING AT THIER HOMES!

2006-07-28 11:43:41 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

he is deployed right now overseas and before he deployed he had a siezure a month b4 he deployed and then a couple spread out over the last year and he loves being apart of the army and doesnt want to tell anyone afraid that he might be medically discharged for "epilepsy" which it seems he might have since theres no other reason as to why he would be having them, he never had them b4 the army, just since hes got out of basic 1 year ago...and im sooo worried he might have one while hes overseas at the wrong time, i talked to him about telling someone and we arnt sure what to do, will he be kicked out the army if we tell someone or will he get sent back here to the states for claiming hes been having these seizures??please someone help me with this!!! i am so scared for him right now.....

2006-07-28 11:16:59 · 14 answers · asked by young army wifey 2

Regarding the statement in an answer from my last question, "b/c they want to become a world power." They could become a world power today if they wanted to. All they have to do is find a good reason for China, and Russia - their incumbent supporters - to unite and fight against America. So my question is now:

Why doesn't North Korea, and their dictator Kim Jong Il just sign a damm treaty with the USA, and call it all good? Why is there so much pride involved? Why cant the US negotiate according to their standards, or even meet somewhere in the middle? Why do countries fight like little children fighting over a piece of candy?

2006-07-28 11:14:53 · 13 answers · asked by Phillip R 4

I'd be more afraid of N. Korea attacking, although we treat them w/kit gloves. China's influnce?

2006-07-28 11:12:13 · 12 answers · asked by heavensent 3

i really want to be in the airforce and im curious for the classes or w/e its called that the soldiers take. what are they? and do they help you when your out and ready for college?

2006-07-28 10:58:31 · 9 answers · asked by nena 2

I understand that Nuclear arms (including short and longrange missles) in North Korea pose a threat to the world. But can't it be seen that Kim Jong Il is trying to pick up some power? Some world freedom? The pride of his country in advancing scientific breakthroughs? Just as Germany, France, S. Korea, Japan, China, etc... and most importantly the USA have done?

Why are the japs tripping like that? They are outright asking North Korea to bomb on them. What are your thoughts?

2006-07-28 10:56:47 · 17 answers · asked by Phillip R 4

2006-07-28 10:47:59 · 2 answers · asked by DAVID F 1

I am in support of the Israeli's finishing what they have started and to completely remove Hezbollah from the planet, once and for all. Whilst there are some people who will not agree with me, I just wonder why they don't. Answers most welcome from Hezbollah supporters and your reasons for supporting this movement.

2006-07-28 10:47:17 · 28 answers · asked by super_star 4

my soul mate leaves for the air force in a few months....then in about 2 years hes going to come home and marry me, then he wants me to live with him on base, and have a baby...(however i would aslo have to take some kind of college while there..online classes or somethin)...but what im wondering is...whats to come? whats it like being a soldiers wife, and a mother living on base...are there things to do? or am i like gonna be bored with nowhere to go?....lol it doesnt really matter, cause no matter what im going with him, id be by his side no matter what...i just wanna have an idea of whats ahead?...so whats it like?? help?

2006-07-28 10:40:54 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm an American and am sick of having to defend this country. It is as a racist country as was nazi Germany was. If the jewish community in America wants to support it, they should go there and do so, instead of sitting in the US and lobbying congress.
By the way, I am a veteran, who has feelings for the boys/girls who
have to go to places like Iraq and soon Israel. Stop your ARROGANCE!!!

2006-07-28 10:17:58 · 25 answers · asked by heavensent 3

Operation Urban Warrior in Oakland California
http://www.defenselink.mil/specials/urbanwarrior/

29 Palms Survey
http://www.29palmssurvey.com/


Hurricane Katrina
http://www.prisonplanet.com/Pages/Sept05/100905policevid.htm

2006-07-28 10:11:45 · 27 answers · asked by sscam2001 3

everyone talks about this HUGE number of troops we have lost during the war on terrorism. but consider this. we have been at war since the end of 2001, going on 5 years now, on TWO fronts, two different countries (we haven't done this since wwII). we have lost a little over 10, 000 troops, in 5 years of the korean war (only 1 country) we lost over 50,000 troops. too many people in this country were spoiled by the 100 day war called the first gulf war. that wasn't a war that was a live fire exercise for all of our new equipment. THIS is a war, and we have suffered less casualties than any previous REAL war.

2006-07-28 10:10:42 · 16 answers · asked by thirteen_fox 3

those who are in the military, are they not allowed to say what they think about the president? or they choose not to for there own good?....cause i was asking a buddy of mine what he thinks about the president and he said cant say about the pres.

2006-07-28 10:05:01 · 10 answers · asked by yahoo2006 4

It is just as easy to have a foolish, simplistic faith in the power of force as to have a similar foolish faith in the power of pacifism.
Answering violence with even more violence does offer a powerful emotional gratification. After the outrage of Sept. 11, 2001, Americans sought — and for a short time got — emotional gratification out of invading Iraq. But we've also paid a heavy price for that.Israel offers another case study. Using airpower and excessive force to crush Hezbollah may feel good, but as a strategy that approach violates every tenet of counterinsurgency warfare. For every 10 guerrillas you kill that way, you risk creating 100, and in the long term the mathematics of that will ruin you.Israel ought to understand that by now. A generation ago, it invaded Lebanon, all but leveling Beirut in the process, trying to teach its enemies a lesson. In the process it ended up radicalizing the Shiites of southern Lebanon and creating Hezbollah, the very group now firing at them.

2006-07-28 09:37:49 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

I was at the Base Exchange yesterday and my friend made the comment, "If I had a dollar for every time somebody asked me how I liked being in the Navy, I could buy a Ferrari. So, how would you finish the comment "If I had a dollar for every time.....?"

2006-07-28 09:36:16 · 21 answers · asked by navyflyrz 2

Does Israel has the right to destroy all infrastructure, kill every innocent person 4 the sake of only 2 soldiers(Not civilians) of Lebanon, they are not going for HEZBALLAH but 4 the whole Lebanon.?

VISIT THIS WEBSITE 4 PICTURES OF RUTHLESS KILLINGS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE http://fromisraeltolebanon.info/

&

http://www.halturnershow.com/IsraeliAtrocities.html

From S.Arbab Ahmed, Khi, Pakistan.

Plz Plz write your and your country name.

Thanks.

2006-07-28 09:35:58 · 31 answers · asked by Action's Fury 1

i think we are,.,.,.,.,but do u.,.,we can thack the hit

2006-07-28 09:34:41 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

do think iran is providing hezbullah with arsenals ??

2006-07-28 09:31:52 · 14 answers · asked by sonic_zerocool 1

Do you think they did that only because Lebanon is weak? Is that why they are playing games with Lebanon? So much destruction just for 2 sodiers which are still alive. What about the civilians which died in Lebanon after the attack?
Would Israel dared to have attack another stronger country?

2006-07-28 09:30:32 · 16 answers · asked by Xyligan 2

2006-07-28 09:23:32 · 9 answers · asked by mrkitties420 4

2006-07-28 09:05:35 · 11 answers · asked by wc_tex 1

2006-07-28 09:05:12 · 7 answers · asked by Donald 1

Lock, stock and barrel, instead of merely to take prisoners of war and then cuddle and rebuild the other country so they will be able to strike back at their convenience?

2006-07-28 09:01:08 · 8 answers · asked by Just Ask 2

With the so called 'War on Terror' brining the Military in contact with irregular combatants more often, guerillas and terrorists etc, should the RoE change to suit the chance in combatant?

2006-07-28 08:56:11 · 12 answers · asked by acidedge2004 3

Do you think the arabs deserve it? Do you feel sorry for the people in Lebanon? Ect.?

2006-07-28 08:34:19 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-28 08:28:03 · 15 answers · asked by klunk 3

what if another country bagan bomb airports and power supply facilities accidentally killing civilians in the US trying to clean out a terrorist org. here like uh...THE KKK! for example...that be interesting...would you support it? and how could they distinguish a kkk member from an average American? Its just a scenario so dont think im anti American as a matter a fact im a soldier and we had a really hard time ID'ing the enemy overseas we couldnt take chances so yes some innocent people died. But is it worth it? We'd make a huge move forward and it seemed like terrorist doubled. NOw troops are having to stay longer. I was PRO WAR before i went overseas...you guys they are recruiting more terrorist because they actually think we are the terrorist the more innocent people die. I love America I love it enough to struggle hard to try to think of an alternatives. Men die so that we can eliminate terror and some US citizens use it as a political campaign to justify their vote. Its sad.

2006-07-28 08:19:26 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Iraqi War is the best thing the Democrats have going for them. The public is slowly tiring of our children dying and the incredibly massive debt that comes therewith. The longer we are in Iraq, the more the military and their families will come to distrust and maybe even despise the Republicans. The longer our children are dying defending Bush’s Iraqi war, the more D’s will be elected. So should the D’s actually be campaigning to “Cut and Run” or “Retreat and Defeat?” And even more problematic, how can they stay "on the right side" of the issue without campaigning to get out!?

In a way, it’s a classical Catch-22. The day we leave Iraq, the D’s lose their best issue. So why not let it drag on for as long as possible, letting Bush, Dick, Condi, and Rummy twist in the wind? This is a highly complex question. What do you think?

2006-07-28 08:12:19 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-28 07:56:12 · 10 answers · asked by someDumbAmerican 4

2006-07-28 07:55:36 · 20 answers · asked by someDumbAmerican 4