I don’t think so. If we stopped catering to these non-English speakers (living in the U.S.), they will have to learn English! Why do agencies, like the Language Access Project, insist that government offices must supply translators for non-English speaking clients? The more we cater to these non-English speakers, the less they learn. In the long run, it will benefit everyone, including the non-English speakers, if we stopped babying them!
Here’s the article that prompted me to post this question:
A new study says language barriers are creating obstacles in benefits offices throughout the city.
The study released Wednesday by immigration advocates found that 26 percent of Human Resource Administration offices are not meeting legal requirements by providing translators for their clients.
Read more:
http://www.ny1.com/ny1/content/index.jsp?stid=1&aid=76506
2007-12-12
11:12:34
·
20 answers
·
asked by
GoYankees&Giants!
5