English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Government - February 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Government

I'm alarmed by Yahoo's cooperation with the UN in this new propaganda campaign via UNICEF advertisements. The US government has rules against government funded propaganda. Shouldn't we have similar laws prohibiting a would-be world-government from using paid advertisements within our borders? Yahoo is a US corporation. If I contact the ACLU, do you think they'll do anything about it?

2007-02-03 11:39:23 · 9 answers · asked by coconutmonkeybank 3

President Bush allocated $125 million to 'assist' the workers who worked at Ground Zero. When the funds weren't being used fast enough, the federal government took back $100 million of those funds. Now our people we called our heroes are dying of cancer and other ground zero illnesses. What kind of a pathetic country is this we're living in when these men and woman can't even pay for their medical treatment? We'll spend billions to kill foreign enemies and nothing to our heroes. What the hell?

2007-02-03 11:16:35 · 8 answers · asked by Bodhi 3

2007-02-03 11:01:52 · 13 answers · asked by dude s 2

That way we could oust an unsatisfactory leader and not suffer through it all until the bitter end of a four year block of time. If that did not work, we could try something else. We need to be flexible. In addition, I think that there would be more politicians of quality hovering around, waiting for a chance, never knowing just when they might be needed. That sounds like a much livelier political scene to me... and very refreshing.

What do you say?

Peace & Love
LPM

2007-02-03 10:38:16 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-03 10:31:05 · 12 answers · asked by hottie 2

Our progress seems so slow.
Did we do something wrong?
What shall we do?

2007-02-03 09:45:13 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

A muslim leader is on record stating they do not recognise our democracy and that in any case the country belongs to Allah and not us.My question is that with such a grave threat to democracy why do our guardians of democracy,(parliament) ignore the threat.

2007-02-03 09:30:49 · 15 answers · asked by trivialsid 2

i have a lot of english mates that live up here,they are sound guys to be honest and liked coming up here to Scotland and love the people. i have lived down england too,have meet alot of good guys down there but have had alot that think that we should be on our OWN. i'm not one but do you think it's for the better?

2007-02-03 09:21:31 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Bush's approval rating has been stuck at around the 31 to 35% rating for what seems like forever now.

These people that still support him are die-hard Republicans.

So here's my question: What would he have to do to loose their support since he hasn't lost it yet?

I think he could eat a baby on live television during the state of the union address and there would still be Republicans that would support him and say, "Well, he had his reasons for eating the baby. I mean did you see that baby? He was asking for it."

2007-02-03 09:06:00 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

If both the president and the vice president were impeached, then who would take over as president?

2007-02-03 08:46:34 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

If money was no object, would you send your kids to a parochial school?

Do you think parochial school kids are better able to compete with their peers when it come to landing jobs and performing better once they get hired than public school counterparts?

Do you think parochial school kids are better off morally and will be happier more stable adults and better parents?

2007-02-03 08:00:50 · 11 answers · asked by John16 5

It can't be Military because it's members are appointed by the Government. It can't be the Government because it's members are elected representatives of the people who also appoint some key officials, and a democratic government is "of the people, by the people and for the people". So "The People" are the real " Super Power".

Doesn't that put a total responsibility on each citizen to adopt, carry, uphold and protect "The American National Values- The values of the Super Power" - Life, Liberty, and Justice for ALL(including non-Americans), in their daily life as they interact with the local other-world( the non-Americans in US) and the world at large, because American leaders induce and propagate these values all over the world with a big bullhorn where ever they go.

This kind of behavior strengthens the basic premise "All Men are Created Equal", a solid basis for the woman's liberation movement in its early stages, strengthens "Super Power" and weakens "terrorism".

2007-02-03 07:54:39 · 3 answers · asked by stvenryn 4

2007-02-03 07:16:52 · 18 answers · asked by Source 4

2007-02-03 06:32:50 · 14 answers · asked by A True Gentleman 5

There is talk about requiring a national ID card. What do you think?

2007-02-03 06:29:35 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I want to know conservative and liberal opinions about this clip. I found it quite interesting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfeBROshZ0M

2007-02-03 06:01:11 · 5 answers · asked by JR 4

Winston Churchill or Tony Blair?
for me its got to be Winston churchill.

2007-02-03 05:58:32 · 28 answers · asked by Just for Laughs 4

press release author= dr.peter snowman

2007-02-03 05:36:22 · 5 answers · asked by Khondaker H 1

2007-02-03 05:34:31 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

put a cap on medical care when hospitals charge $20 for a box of Kleenex? Now Bush wants to cut ss and medicare. Instead would it not be better to regulate what can be charged??? This is crazy. What happens to the people of the US when Bush spends all our money on the war in Iraq?

2007-02-03 05:06:03 · 12 answers · asked by raineydazey 2

2007-02-03 04:21:23 · 3 answers · asked by srikanth reddy 1

fedest.com, questions and answers