Isn't the creation of a social tax, and therefore a social and moral "obligation", really an establishment of a religious POV? Isn't it requiring and forcing all people to follow the Judeo-Christian, Islamic, and other religious teachings that direct their followers to "tithe" to the less fortunate?
So does that mean it's OK to establish a "little" bit of these religions if it's "well intentioned"?
What about people who don't believe in tithing, who believe that "God helps those who help themselves", or think such charitable practices are better left to individuals through their own religious beliefs, as much or as little as they wish? Is it just, "TOO BAD, this is the religion we've established and you MUST OBEY?"
I'm all for helping the poor and less fortunate. I just don't understand how these taxes aren't a violation of the Establishment clause of the Constitution.
F.D.R. was the president who read from the bible on the radio every week in fireside chats, right?
2007-09-28
11:53:55
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Other - Politics & Government