can someone explain to me how cheaper products are a benefit when there are no jobs to buy the cheap products ?
2007-09-28 11:13:25 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Are you kidding? He couldn't care less nor could anyone else in his Administration or his supporters.
2007-09-28 11:17:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
There is a simple fix to the Rust Belt, eliminate Unions, the minimum wage, the Consumer Price Index and the NLRB.
While we're at it, get rid of every facet of the New Deal and the Great Society.
It isn't the government's responsibility to find you a job.
2007-09-28 22:41:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Could the people move out of the rust belt? Another weird idea from you. Of course Bush has not. He has been busy wrecking buildings, causing hurricanes and fires, plotting assassinations, many other things.
2007-09-28 18:20:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Cheaper products due to a weaker currency are a benefit in terms of exports - the people buying exports do not need jobs in the US to do so.
Also, there are never 'no jobs.' Even durring the worst part of the Great Depression, people were employed.
2007-09-28 18:19:12 · answer #4 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes to ship them overseas, and yes nobody cares if you can buy them or not there will allways be rich people
2007-09-28 18:20:50 · answer #5 · answered by CHRIS S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋