I would not call Ron Paul the most liberal politician but he definitely is not popular with the Republican base.
2007-09-28 11:44:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Report Abuse 6
·
5⤊
4⤋
I know it is confusing but I will try to explain what has happened.
The Republican Party used to be the conservative party. The party of states rights and individual freedom. The Republicans were against communism and socialism. Then starting in the late 1970's a large group Marxist Jews saw that the Soviet Union was crumbling and the the Republicans were gaining traction with the voters. These Marxist Jews repackaged themselves as "Neo Conservatives" and took over the Republican Party. Although they changed their party affiliation their core values remained the same. They desire an all powerful state that can control and intimidate the population. Since this take over of the Republican Party what we used to think of an communism is now call conservatism.
Ron Paul is what we used to call conservative and all the other candidate are what we used to call Marxists.
2007-09-28 14:24:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
I'm a Conservative. I usually vote Republican.
George Bush is TOO Liberal for ME!
I think Ron Paul is less liberal than George Bush.
It is Conservative to follow the Constitution.
Ron Paul is more Libertarian.
I don't know what George Bush is.
2007-09-28 12:42:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Philip H 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
You don't know very much about politics. Ron Paul is anything but a liberal. I guarantee that if you look at his complete platform you will disagree with many of his stances.
He may sound liberal because he is against the war (because Congress didn't vote to declare war).
Paul is also an isolationist and believes that America should get out of every country we have soldiers stationed in and eliminate all foreign aid to other countries.....that is NOT a liberal stance.
2007-09-28 11:46:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
5⤋
Get rich quick schemes in the capitalist business world, (buyouts, IPOs, conglomerates, acquisitions, mergers, and the stock market), do not actually work. Remaining solvent does not actually exist within false economics capitalism.
Profit existing in the capitalist business world, or millionaires existing within capitalism, is pathological deception committed by the 21 organizations spying on the population with plain clothes agents, (with covert fake names and fake backgrounds).
Actual economics is the persons paying the monthly business loan payments of companies voting at work in order to control the property they are paying for.
Capitalism is the psychology of imaginary parents, false economics, and the criminal deception of employees that are paying the bills (including the stocks and bonds, or shares) of companies.
Anti-democracy republicanism is the psychology of imaginary parents and false government.
2007-09-29 09:23:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
I totally dislike Paul but he is a libertarian, not a democrat. Democrats are socialists.
Paul is just weird. He won't pull vote away from anyone (including the GOP) - he's at only 1%, in spite of what his Yahoo supporters say.
2007-09-28 11:56:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
Ron Paul did a poor job in the debates last night. He is a dark horse is anything at all. He should phase out soon and if worth bothering with. Even the Democrats needn't worry about him.
2007-09-28 11:55:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by senior citizen 5
·
4⤊
5⤋
Someone has to had heard of Ron Paul for him to be popular first,
2007-09-28 11:45:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
4⤋
Paul who?
no, the most liberal politician running is indisputably dennis kucinich. hands down. too bad he doesn't have a gazillion dollars floating around like ms clinton; he'd be a fine president.
2007-09-28 11:52:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
Ive always though of him as a moderate libertarian not a liberal
2007-09-28 17:17:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋