Hello everyone. I just finished up jury duty yesterday, and I'd love your opinions on how this trial should have ended. Here it is in a nutshell....An 18 year old boy was driving with his friend as the passenger. He was driving at least 70-80 on a country road. He purposely excelerated at a railroad track to try to "catch air"...meaning go airborne over the tracks. Upon doing so, he lost control of the car, swirved all over the road, went into the ditch, hit rocks, flew some more, and the car rolled. He had a few scratches; his friend died. Would you consider this "careless driving" described as negligence while driving a vehicle, or "vehicular homicide" which is described as "grossly negligent" driving. It all comes down to "negligent" verses "grossly negligent." No drinking or drugs involved. So what do you think....negligent driving or grossly negligent. We had varying outlooks while deliberating, and I'd like your input (and maybe some peace of mind!). Thanks!
2007-08-31
13:07:44
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Meg S
1
in
Law & Ethics