English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 13 June 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

2007-06-13 16:36:00 · 3 answers · asked by Don W 6 in Politics

I mean it's physically impossable to impose restrictions on non physical entities, is it not? I'm NO computer wiz here but what is one gonna due to regulate what comes over the net, put sensoring devices in our satellites or tell servers what they can allow to go on the net? I mean the severs might not even be USA based, not under McCain law/jurisdiction, am I right on this? Is there even any truth to this McCain/regulation story, anybody else ever even hear of it? I could see a tax being imposed as the politicians(magicians!) of the demo/repubie party are always looking for another excuse to get into our wallets. International(UN) regulation, US of A regulation??? Frankly, I would think regulation of a world wide net an impossable feat, but again, I'm no computer wiz! Anybody with the straight dope on this rumor, story, fact or what ever it is?

2007-06-13 16:34:38 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

I say chump. This man brought down a country. Him and Woodward & Bernstien and the Washington Post. I hope they're happy now!

2007-06-13 16:30:32 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

ok, i've heard a lot of answers........

i personally thought jfk was the best, but many people on this site happen to disagree with me. sorry, but i still like him.
reagan.........nah
nixon............the name speaks for himself
FDR..........don't know too much abou him but i heard he was pretty good. he gets the rap with locking of japanese prisoners. but we were at a war right? and not some skirmish like iraq, but a real war. japan was NOT our friend during WWII. how was he as a person? did he "cheat" on his wife?
ABE.......he's the complete opposite of JFK. while i like jfk and people disagree with me, people seem to like abe and i disagree with them.
(http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0874850851.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg)

worst......
i heard buchanon was the worst. really? what was up with the civil war?
carter.......haven't decided on him yet, i don't if it was a good or bad thing for him to pardon the draft dodgers
bush........still waiting

so what are your opinions?

2007-06-13 16:30:27 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Abortion is not murder, a fetus is not a baby, and a woman is not an incubator.

2007-06-13 16:29:42 · 35 answers · asked by Hannah 2 in Politics

i need an job,but i think,i will go in to the army national guard i qualify fr that

2007-06-13 16:28:39 · 4 answers · asked by Brian P 1 in Law & Ethics

Or maybe I should ask, do you have a choice?

2007-06-13 16:23:12 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

can someone tell me how to deal with someone who just joined the army and done with boot camp and ait who has a deep depression and no one to talk to. worried about this person how they feel and what they may do

2007-06-13 16:23:05 · 7 answers · asked by fancy 3 in Military

2007-06-13 16:22:28 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

2007-06-13 16:20:16 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

There is a least five you can mention lets see if you know..

2007-06-13 16:16:24 · 6 answers · asked by ION-CONSTITUTION 2 in Politics

why don't you pay more taxes, so at least you are not undertaxed?

http://yankeecommentary.blogspot.com/

2007-06-13 16:15:09 · 10 answers · asked by RICARDVS 4 in Politics

The Chairmen of the committees of Congress now have slushfunds to Hide porkbarrel sponsors

2007-06-13 16:14:47 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/05/military_whitehouse_opposeraise_070516w/
White House opposes 3.5 percent pay raise

By Rick Maze - Staff writer
Posted : Wednesday May 16, 2007 17:47:40 EDT

Troops don’t need bigger pay raises, White House budget officials said Wednesday in a statement of administration policy laying out objections to the House version of the 2008 defense authorization bill.

The Bush administration had asked for a 3 percent military raise for Jan. 1, 2008, enough to match last year’s average pay increase in the private sector. The House Armed Services Committee recommends a 3.5 percent pay increase for 2008, and increases in 2009 through 2012 that also are 0.5 percentage point greater than private-sector pay raises.

2007-06-13 16:12:53 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

These socialists are a threat to this country and the common American person. We need to form organizations to find these people and have them dealt with.

2007-06-13 16:12:38 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Civic Participation

It seems that people have lost track of what anarchy is. If someone can give me a good answer that shows you know what your talking about ill give you best answer.

2007-06-13 16:12:34 · 4 answers · asked by giunta48 2 in Law & Ethics

Genral Pace had been Joint chief of staff for the las 6 years in helping out GBUSH to manage Iraq war. While he spoke so kindly about him they are making it look that he wanted to leave the position. Is he the escape goat that this administration needs to distantiate themselves from Iraq miserable failure?

2007-06-13 16:09:11 · 6 answers · asked by ION-CONSTITUTION 2 in Politics

The Total Amount for the Year is $240 BILLION DOLLARS+.......

2007-06-13 16:09:10 · 2 answers · asked by dca2003311@yahoo.com 7 in Other - Politics & Government

Because we eat a lot of beef and chicken, drink a lot of milk everyday.

2007-06-13 16:07:40 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

It is a match made in heaven. They both hate America.

2007-06-13 16:06:48 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

President Bush and the Amnesty Republicans are attempting to
convince about a dozen Republicans to support "cloture" on
Bush-Kennedy in exchange for a commitment that a set list
of amendments will be considered -- thus, "amendments for amnesty."

Also, Bush and the amnesty leaders are strong-arming conservatives
into accepting the "amendments for amnesty" deal or face being
banished into Senate oblivion.

Amnesty Republicans have already submitted their list of amendments
to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Once the "amendments for
amnesty" deal is finalized between Reid and the Republicans,
the bill will be quickly brought back to the floor. The amendments
will be defeated and amnesty passed.

2007-06-13 16:06:03 · 11 answers · asked by Fedup Veteran 6 in Immigration

2007-06-13 16:03:08 · 9 answers · asked by crazzy 4 in Politics

that will bring the Amnesty bill back for a vote in exchange for consideration on certain amendments? Once the "amendments for
amnesty" deal is finalized between Reid and the Republicans, the bill will be quickly brought back to the floor. The amendments will be defeated and amnesty passed. Bush is strong-arming conservatives into accepting the "amendments for amnesty" deal or face being banished into Senate oblivion. this is the FOURTH TIME our leaders have gone behind closed doors to work out some secret scheme to get this bill passed. Despite unprecedented and overwhelming grassroots
opposition, they think they can still pull off their legislative, slight-of-hand trickery! Are you still fighting?

2007-06-13 16:00:35 · 6 answers · asked by Cherie 6 in Other - Politics & Government

Who do you contact to stop the fraud?

2007-06-13 16:00:26 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

My sister was at a bad time in her life and signed up for the army reserves with pretty much no other options. She was told she had to be sworn in twice. Well she went through with the first swearing in. Then months went by and she heard nothing from her recruiter.
She has since moved back in with my mother and has graduated from high school She is 18 now and has been accepted to several college universities. She has her life back on track now and then today her recruiter calls her up and says he is picking her up tomorrow!
She was never sworn in for the second time....he told her today that whoever told her that did not know what they were talking about. She has no choice. He says if she backs out they will place her under dishonorable discharge and that it will "haunt her for the rest of her life" Is there anyway she can get out of this??

2007-06-13 15:59:51 · 15 answers · asked by sarah t 3 in Military

so they can have their fascism, religion and oil all wrapped into one

2007-06-13 15:54:32 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

fedest.com, questions and answers