Politics & Government - 27 April 2007

Anything?

2007-04-27 11:33:19 · 12 answers · asked by jeb black 5 in Politics

the person already bought the house , so what i want to know is if he can kick me out now? or do i have time to find a place to live, technically i am now a tenant.

2007-04-27 11:30:18 · 3 answers · asked by tulipp 1 in Law & Ethics

The tenant's apartment is in the basement. He has lived there for aproximately 3 years and he moved into the apartment when there was a different owner. There is also a clause in the lease that states that the place has not been tested for radon. Also, the guy is a heavy cigarette smoker. (No record as of yet as to where the guy lived previously)

For the record, I feel aweful about it but at the same time I don't want to see a lawsuit.

2007-04-27 11:24:16 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

If not, why complain about the democrats?

Doesn't the two-party system offer the necessary checks and balances to ensure one party doesn't run amok?

Would you trust the government under a one-party system?

2007-04-27 11:22:20 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

neighbor cut my cable in front of a witness and the police said it was a grey area. what are the laws regarding vandalism and how do I persue the issue when the office made me feel it was my fault and we didn't do anything wrong. we have already proved there was no connection form our cable to hers and that our cable was still active when the tech came to reinstall cable after all the damage she did.

2007-04-27 11:19:27 · 3 answers · asked by alatator 1 in Law & Ethics

Since she's elevated herself to new heights, why isn't she and her compatriots searching for Osama Bin Laden ?
We get over-whelmed here everyday with Liberals saying 'Bush should be looking for Bin Laden' and 'Bin Laden is in Afghanistan, not Iraq' . . .. ok smartguys. . . Nancy had no right to go to Syria, but since you believe she did, then why isn't Nancy and Harry and John and the rest of the good ol boys club, not looking for Bin Laden ?

2007-04-27 11:10:36 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Relations between your company and the call center have broken down. First, your company let the call center borrow a new laser copy machine that the call center has refused to return. Your company has also learned that the call center has been telling its customers that your company has been cheating its customers and breaking contracts, which is untrue.
So specifically, the president wants to know if your company has any civil tort actions that it can bring against the call center.
Plz provide me with references as well....Thank you for your honesty!

2007-04-27 11:08:24 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2007-04-27 11:07:51 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

For example: Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, John Kerry and Joe Biden.

2007-04-27 11:04:43 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

If Canada, ALL of Latin America, and the European Union oppose the barbaric, Nazi measures you want to take against illegal immigrants, what makes you think you, who most likely have never been out of the country, are right?

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/04/18/mexico.eu.ap/index.html

2007-04-27 11:00:23 · 15 answers · asked by Siervocal 4 in Immigration

Is it because he told the truth about Bush's illegal war and said we should "make it a felony" to stay there? Is it because he said that when the pro-war Senators filibuster, that they should have a cloture vote every day at 12 o'clock so that the American People can see who's keeping the war going? If so, isn't that the way 70% of the American people feel and shouldn't he be included in debates? Wouldn't it be a violation of the "Fairness Doctrine" that Democrats support if the other Democrats refuse to let him debate them?

Why did CNN decide to pull Gravel from the debates?

2007-04-27 10:59:49 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

2007-04-27 10:58:02 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

We fought the country OF Iraq, for a few days, and toppled the ba'ath regime government.

We then allowed DEMOCRATIC elections.

We are now Fighting "people in Iraq", who do not want to honor the wishes of the Iraqi people. We are NOT fighting "the iraqi people".

What is so hard to understand about that?

2007-04-27 10:56:10 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

Calm down: asking for a friend

2007-04-27 10:54:13 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

I don't think people really understand the consequences of pulling out of the war. Sure, we get our troops back, but you think you're paying high prices for gas now... wait til our troops come home. And then, they'll be begging Bush to do something, like he's been trying to right now, and the troops will have to go right back in. Do people not understand that? I support the war all the way. I'm behind our troops, and the president's decision to not put a timeline on the war.

2007-04-27 10:52:31 · 36 answers · asked by Becky Jo 4 in Politics

He is young and believes he is doing his country good service,
how can I look at him and encourage him on when I do not believe we should stay in the middle of a civil war? When I believe the will of the people shows it should stop and Our President is not listening? How do I hide my fear of his being returned to me in pieces and for what ? A Country that is hell bent on killing all its citizens? What do I tell him the day he leaves?

2007-04-27 10:51:55 · 22 answers · asked by searching 2 in Military

Be honest, please.

If you truly believe that, then maybe you should receive some counseling. Do you think that maybe liberals are so passionate about their point of view that they actually care about where the country is headed?

2007-04-27 10:49:50 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Yes it tells the insurgents, "terrorists" etc when we are leaving, but doesn't it ALSO tell the Iraqi government when we are leaving? Doesn't this force the Iraqi government to get their act together?

2007-04-27 10:46:37 · 13 answers · asked by Nick F 6 in Politics

I received a citation in Santa Clara County, CA for Violation of California Vehicle Code 22451, Railroad Grade Crossings.

According to the California DMV website, the fine for first infraction is $100.00 (http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d18/vc42001_16.htm)

My Courtesy Notice from Santa Clara County designates bail as $375.00.

Is the county able to assess its own $275 fine on TOP of the state fine of $100?

Should I go to court and try to get the fine reduced?

Help!

Thanks in advance.

2007-04-27 10:44:25 · 4 answers · asked by resumesbyadrian 2 in Law & Ethics

By having these bases we create fear in other countries who, in return, hate us!

2007-04-27 10:43:29 · 12 answers · asked by michael h 1 in Military

know what they are marching for?I think it's more of an excuse to get out of work/school.Lets face it parades are usually pretty cool...My answer maybe 10%

2007-04-27 10:43:17 · 6 answers · asked by Linda L 2 in Immigration

You know, I find it a bit amazing how only a week away, a UN report showed that Iran is still at the EARLY stages of low-grade uranium enrichment (this--after 2 YEARS of enrichment), has between 300-1,300 centrifuges operating, and has plans still to build a light-water nuclear reactor for the sole purpose of generating power.

Does this look like nuclear weapons proliferation to you? (Keep in mind, Bush said the same thing about Iraq too: "Saddam is 5 years away from building nuclear weapons." (2002) )

I know there are a lot of people here who want to see Iran bombed just for the sake of argument. But a recent news report suggested that if Israel were to take proactive measures against Iran, it could very well drag the US into a war against a much tougher enemy than Iraq ever was. (And also keep in mind: Iran's military hasn't been tested militarily, nor is it crippled like ours is at the moment.)

2007-04-27 10:41:12 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

Please, people lets support Ron Paul for President of the United States.

He is labeled as Dr. No because he always votes against laws and regulations that are against the Consitution of the US.

Ron Paul for President

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

2007-04-27 10:36:17 · 13 answers · asked by Teacher 4 in Politics

Can you admit that America is a Christian nation,always was,always will be?

2007-04-27 10:35:53 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

.
and..accepting that Saudi Arabian hostage-takers were involved, it was also discovered that the 911 tragedy, led by brilliant, deceiving minds, was also part of an "inside job"?

(not at all a "conspiracy theory"
...just "another way of looking at it").

2007-04-27 10:33:24 · 8 answers · asked by rare2findd 6 in Politics

Are there any other main points besides the second amendment and the fact that people die? Please do not tell me how dumb I am for supporting gun control laws... I dont need people to try and change my opinion... I am wondering about other reasons besides the fact that the second amendment is meant for militia reasons and the fact that many people die, so that i can get a full understanding

2007-04-27 10:32:32 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2007-04-27 10:31:53 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

The chimpanzee forehead.
The close together beady eyes.
The speech impediments.
Obvious learning disabilities.
Obvious social problems.
Obvious emotional problems.

I think Babara was really swilling down the misty water when she was carrying Junior around.

How does he look to you?

2007-04-27 10:30:27 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

Abortion is always defended as being necessary and, invariably, someone who defends it says that we have to think about rape and incest. But shouldn't justifications be reflected by reality? Because in reality, rape and incest account for less than 10% combined of the reasons given by women for abortions in the US.

these are the reasons given for abortions according to planned parenthood and other sources:

"Three-fourths of women cite concern for or responsibility to other individuals; three-fourths say they cannot afford a child; three-fourths say that having a baby would interfere with work, school or the ability to care for dependents; and half say they do not want to be a single parent or are having problems with their husband or partner"

If a man who has fathered a child gives these reasons for not supporting the child he's considered a deadbeat. Please no "he should have thought of that before sex" unless you say the same thing to women who get abortions.

Thanks.

2007-04-27 10:26:51 · 8 answers · asked by pimphofoo 2 in Law & Ethics

2007-04-27 10:26:13 · 5 answers · asked by jimmyjim 1 in Law & Ethics