.
and..accepting that Saudi Arabian hostage-takers were involved, it was also discovered that the 911 tragedy, led by brilliant, deceiving minds, was also part of an "inside job"?
(not at all a "conspiracy theory"
...just "another way of looking at it").
2007-04-27 10:33:24 · 8 answers · asked by rare2findd 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
====================
.
in other words that BOTH the Saudi muslims AND U.S. insiders were involved.
.
.
2007-04-27 10:35:45 · update #1
Not at all 'lazy'. Just making the question readable and also making the main part of the entire question seen first. (Not enough room,silly).
2007-04-27 11:03:55 · update #2
humm..you say:
"But their is NO WAY this administration would have been smart enough to pull that off and not get caught before now."
.
Thus you really believe that binLaden was "smart enough to pull that off"...You really believe that this big overgrown Arab was "smart" enough to pull that off.
Humm
I see.
2007-04-27 11:06:06 · update #3
.
.
"must be a typical Bush hating liberal" you say?
not at all. Not a liberal OR conservative
OR independent. Some of us just think for ourselves. I don't need to be defined as most pathetically shackled together party-grabbers do, yourself included.
2007-04-27 11:11:00 · update #4
I tried telling you and you called me a radical.
Even if they finally were told the facts, they would still call me a radical.
2007-04-27 10:40:42 · answer #1 · answered by asmikeocsit 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would be absolutely shocked and outraged of course.
But their is NO WAY this administration would have been smart enough to pull that off and not get caught before now.
And sorry, using semantics to call it "just another way of looking at it" doesn't mean you're not espousing a conspiracy theory.
2007-04-27 17:38:26 · answer #2 · answered by BOOM 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
My first reaction would be, "huh?"
I have no idea what you are trying to say. You make absolutely no sense, which means you must be a typical Bush hating liberal.
2007-04-27 17:39:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The so called "Bush scandals" are nothing more than a liberal fantasy. The more the liberals lie the better they climax.
2007-04-27 21:34:45 · answer #4 · answered by Erik A 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No idea what your question even asks. Next time don't abbreviate you sound slow. I mean really abbreviating Be to B? Seriously are you that lazy?
2007-04-27 17:37:12 · answer #5 · answered by jay k 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I thought that all of you tinfoil hat-wearing moonbats had alreaady determined all of this to be true.
The fact that there is no evidence to support any of your claims only means that this is a very good cover-up, right?
2007-04-27 17:38:19 · answer #6 · answered by dvari 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I already understand the plan so my reaction? There wouldn't even be one.
2007-04-27 17:41:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
lol, because that is absurd. Just as I am lol at your question. You are out of touch with reality.
2007-04-27 17:38:48 · answer #8 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋