We're there, we all want to win, and no serious Democrat wants to bring all of the soldiers home today, it would be impossible.
We need to put an end to Bush's position as ultimate "decider" on all things in Iraq, and get a concensus opinion that the entire country can get behind. Baker/Hamilton made the suggestion of talking with Syria and Iran, why was that never looked into? Wouldn't our presence in Iraq be more tolerable if we made it known to the Iraqi people that we have no plans for a permanent presence in Iraq, and discontinued the construction of permanent military bases? Why not flesh out a good plan that utilizes troops to a full potential before throwing them into the fire as part of an escalation? Bush has the opportunity to be the uniter that he said he was, but instead plays the role of the stubborn child once again.
2007-02-17
16:51:38
·
14 answers
·
asked by
I'll Take That One!
4
in
Politics