So let me get this straight. Liberals are for CUTTING (our losses) AND RUNNING (from) Iraq, but almost immediately after gaining a 'mandate' from the public, Nancy Pelosi sticks it to the people by passing a non binding resolution that is completely outside of their jurisdiction, and therefore, unenforceable. Democrats don't support the troops in Iraq, but rather than voting to actually stop funding the war that puts them there, which is within the powers and abilities, the best Democrats can expect is a non-binding resolution that addresses the decision to go to war, which is, as far as I understand, not supposed to be in their purview. It's a good thing for Democrats that the electorate doesn't respond to inept leadership the same way Conservatives do. Conservatives respond to inept leadership by not turning out to the polls, which in essence is saying, 'why should I take time from my busy schedule to go and vote for someone who is not going to do what I have elected them to do?'
2007-02-17
14:56:19
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Raalnan5
2
in
Politics