Politics & Government - 11 October 2006

2006-10-11 06:20:00 · 10 answers · asked by Spud55 5 in Government

I'm up in court for a bullshit charge but I know that if it goes to a magistraights then they'll go with the police whereas if I have trial by jury the common folk will see sence. I've yet to recieve a summonds.

2006-10-11 06:20:00 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061011/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_iraq;_ylt=AjtwL35WAP0Pwjj2EYzQ5EWs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3OTB1amhuBHNlYwNtdHM-

2006-10-11 06:19:56 · 13 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics

Recent drum-pounding by the pundits in preparing for a showdown with Iran, recent reports show that the Navy's Eisenhower Carrier group is in route to Iran. Is this the October suprise Karl Rove and the crew are planning?

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20061009/lindorff

2006-10-11 06:18:54 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-10-11 06:18:31 · 5 answers · asked by Dr.O 5 in Politics

bring our troops home. source:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061011/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraqi_death_toll;_ylt=ArNLL4dJ5Y6mls5sZPyfZ5es0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3OTB1amhuBHNlYwNtdHM-

2006-10-11 06:17:10 · 10 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics

If he hasn't had to, why not?
I accidentally started a forest fire, thought I'd put out the fire, left, a forest fire broke out.
Now court is considering making me pay for restitution. I can understand that.
Shouldn't Clinton have had to pay taxpayers back for his mistake? If he hadn't lied about it, it would have been much less of a cost.
I came forward immediately and took responsiblity and have plead guilty. I could have played the legal came, gotten good lawyer, made the court prove its case against me. Woulda cost tax payers more.
If you see this as different, please help me see it your way.
Thanks

2006-10-11 06:16:55 · 15 answers · asked by Joy_Brigade 3 in Law Enforcement & Police

My fault, I worded incorrectly. Same question.

Just for a moment, lets stop mudslinging...?
Is anybody seriously worried about being nuked? Or is all anyone can think about is which party to blame? I'm actually worried for the first time...Its one thing to raise the terror level but another thing entirely to hear about Nuke testing. I was just wondering if anyone else might be a little concerned?

2006-10-11 06:16:55 · 16 answers · asked by Sticky 2 in Other - Politics & Government

We invaded the middle east looking for weapons of mass distruction and didn't find any. Just oil.
N. Korea has said weapons, but we haven't offered them any sort of aggression, Why?

2006-10-11 06:16:27 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

Next week I have to give a speech in front of my entire college about the war, and how to get kids involved in the voting process. My entire Speech class is giving individual speeches, and a lot of the more common topics have been chosen (i.e. bush's cut on financial aid, soldiers dying, ...)

i need a topic that will appeal to college level kids. i've looked at TONS of anti-war websites, and i am looking into the details of bush's speeches right now, but i'd still like to know your input. i'd appreciate only helpful answers please.

2006-10-11 06:15:59 · 10 answers · asked by I Wonder 2 in Civic Participation

he filed for an extension in the usa and its now over its date.. and he really made me mad...how do i call immigration on him? i'm trying to find the numbers online.

2006-10-11 06:15:26 · 18 answers · asked by ellie_2121 3 in Immigration

2006-10-11 06:14:58 · 11 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics

Specially If u r an American then wat do u think abt that documentry

2006-10-11 06:14:56 · 9 answers · asked by Sohail Kashif 2 in Military

do black people care about George Bush?

2006-10-11 06:14:36 · 11 answers · asked by pregunton-tonton 1 in Politics

still believe the Iraqis are better off than they were before BUSH invaded, better off without Sadam, who seemed able to control insurgency and also if you do think so, why?

PS> THis number just released.

2006-10-11 06:13:49 · 15 answers · asked by meldorhan 4 in Politics

All I can find is sites trying to sell not telling the the law

2006-10-11 06:13:06 · 2 answers · asked by mary texas 4 in Law & Ethics

Seriously - Saddam kept Iraq safe for him and his supporters using all the techniques that Bush and his cronnies want to use now -- from torture to wiretapping. I agree, that's a fair way to keep a country safe. Then, why not just bring the expert on that area? Saddam, as brutal as he is, kept Iraq safe from terrorism, and he really understood the definition of "with us or against us."

2006-10-11 06:12:58 · 9 answers · asked by pregunton-tonton 1 in Politics

2006-10-11 06:12:30 · 6 answers · asked by zclifton2 6 in Other - Politics & Government

2006-10-11 06:11:44 · 6 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics

He was voted in twice.

2006-10-11 06:10:33 · 22 answers · asked by Hamish 7 in Elections

right in his face. I think he got mad. I don't know what to do, should I send him a get well card or apologize?

2006-10-11 06:10:10 · 19 answers · asked by ? 6 in Other - Politics & Government

The beggar was busking and i pretended to give money but i ended up taking money. Aren't I a naughty boy? :)

2006-10-11 06:09:55 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

Looks to me that Bush is teetering on an acceptance of the fact that the US military is stretched far too thin as it is. Not only that I really believe that he is afraid of further military action albeit his further rhetoric that the US "reserves all options to defend our friends in the region." (China has a HUGE military, much larger than the US. Why would they need the US?)

Pres. Bush called Wednesday for stiff sanctions on North Korea for its reported nuclear test. In a Rose Garden news conference, Bush said the United States "reserves all options to defend our friends in the region, and .
"remains committed to diplomacy. He also said that the "United States has "no intention of attacking" the reclusive regime."It didn't work in the past. ... I learned a lesson from that. You have a better diplomatic hand with others sending the message," Bush said.
He supports a resumption of six-way talks among North Korea, South Korea, China, Russia, Japan and the United States.
humm

2006-10-11 06:09:27 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

What does this mean...if it doesn't mean giving them citizenship? what exactly does this mean? becuase they are saying now that they don't want amnesty

2006-10-11 06:08:43 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

I would say that it is minor. A few countries have nuclear weapons and some are more volatile and generally unstable than North Korea. Pakistan definitely comes to mind. And Russia could definitely be viewed as unstable. North Korea is simply testing the waters here. These types of things are nothing new. The Bush administration came out right away with a public stance but this would have occured during any administration. We have seen these things before.

2006-10-11 06:08:14 · 9 answers · asked by cannonball 1 in Other - Politics & Government

2006-10-11 06:08:10 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

All I asked was if a particular "prophet" who founded a certain "religion" in the year 622 C.E. in Mecca, was indeed a pedophile, rapist, and murderer, who spread his twisted cult by force.

Aparently this violated "Community Guidelines."

What do you think?

2006-10-11 06:07:36 · 16 answers · asked by thealligator414 3 in Other - Politics & Government

When will we wake up and reject these lieing ******* in the republicans and democrats, can't everyone see that they don't work for us anymore. They work for the multinational corps and special interest. And I don't know what to think of the republicans especially, just a bunch of lieing, smoke and mirrors, tax and spend *******.

2006-10-11 06:06:58 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

It's funny that you like to twist the law around to benefit yourself and these criminals - Facts are facts - They broke the law.

Under Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.S. Code, "Improper Entry by Alien," any citizen of any country other than the United States who:

Enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers; or

Eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers; or

Attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact;
has committed a federal crime.

Violations are punishable by criminal fines and imprisonment for up to six months. Repeat offenses can bring up to two years in prison. Additional civil fines may be imposed at the discretion of immigration judges, but civil fines do not negate the criminal sanctions or nature of the offense.

2006-10-11 06:06:46 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

People out. .......I believe haters, rapist, racist, anti-immigration, evil, Hispanic haters (or any other race), pedophiles ARE ALL THE SAME.

2006-10-11 06:05:49 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration