I posted the announcement of finding 500 WMD in Iraq last night.
Liberals were quick to jump on the bandwagon saying, "these aren't the weapons we went to war for", and "these were old weapons".
They were quick to quote parts of news stories, but left part out. Guess which part of the following was left out:
"The weapons are thought to be manufactured before 1991 so they would not be proof of an ongoing WMD program in the 1990s. But they do show that Saddam Hussein was lying when he said all weapons had been destroyed, and it shows that years of on-again, off-again weapons inspections did not uncover these munitions."
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html
If you guessed the latter half, you are correct.
I'm wondering, why you libs are so quick to defend someone like saddam. Is it you are so bitter that kerry isn't president, that you would defend a man that murdered thousands upon thousands of his countrymen before you can defend your own President?
2006-06-22
04:23:39
·
22 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics