I am just starting a debate, not taking sides.
But I had this conversation last night and I would like your input.
With all the advancements in on and off ice training, the increase in size of athletes in general, nutrition, equipment, sophisticated systems play, rule changes, etc. It can easily be argued that today's athletes have a distinct advantage over those of years past and therefore should be the best overall athletes in the history of the game.
Even with the NHL talent level diluted to the degree that it is now, do you believe that these advancements have increased the ability of players to be better than ever?
Or is the fact that records aren't being shattered right and left just magnify how diluted the talent really is considering these advantages?
2007-12-28
04:02:01
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Zam
5
in
Hockey