The argument that all of religion should be condemned by atheists (including religious moderates and liberals) has been made by a couple of prominent figures now, including Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins.
The idea is that religious fundamentalists validate religious extremists, that moderates validate fundamentalists, and that liberals validate moderates (see Harris' 'concentric circles' argument below).
Does this argument hold water?
Atheists and agnostics: should we buy this argument? Is it of the 'slippery slope' form (if so, is that okay)? Should we regard moderates no differently than religious extremists, or should we be tolerant of anyone not actively violent and oppressive?
Religious moderates: do tolerant religious people create a 'cultural shield' for religious extremists? If so, is there something that the average religious moderate can do about it?
2007-12-10
15:46:14
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous