In Acts 28:17 - Pual calls the chief Jews together and they say, "We neither received letters out of Judaea concerning thee, neither any of the brethren that came shewed or spake any harm of thee.
22 But we desire to hear of thee what thou thinkest: for as concerning this sect, we know that every where it is spoken against."
(KJV)
If Peter had preached in Rome, why would Paul go there?
Rom 15:20
20 Yea, so have I strived to preach the gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I should build upon another man's foundation:
(KJV)
If Peter was in Rome when the Book of Romans was written, why didn't Paul greet Him?
It is not written anywhere in the Bible that Peter was in Rome.
When the claim is made, it should be treated like any other claim. We should look into the New Testament to see if it can be substantiated.
If the New Testament were silent, I would be too. But what we find is proof Peter was not there before 60 A.D. without a doubt.
2007-11-29
14:25:34
·
6 answers
·
asked by
realchurchhistorian
4