"in the atmosphere and in the various water basins of the primitive earth, many destructive interactions would have so vastly diminished, if not altogether consumed, essential precursor chemicals, that chemical evolution rates would have been negligible. The soup would have been too dilute for direct polymerization to occur. Even local ponds for concentrating soup ingredients would have met with the same problem. Furthermore, no geological evidence indicates an organic soup, even a small organic pond, ever existed on this planet. It is becoming clear that however life began on earth, the usually conceived notion that life emerged from an oceanic soup of organic chemicals is a most implausible hypothesis. We may therefore with fairness call this scenario `the myth of the prebiotic soup.'"
[Charles B. Thaxton, et al, The Mystery of Life's Origin: Reassessing Current Theories (New York: Philosophical Library, 1984), p.66
Charles B. Thaxton: Creationist / Chemist / Ph.D. in Chemistry from Iowa State University / Postdoctoral Fellow at Harvard University (2 years), history and philosophy of science / Postdoctoral appointment in molecular biology laboratory at Brandeis University (3 years) / Director of Curriculum Research of the Foundation for Thought and Ethics in Dallas / Staff member of the Julian Center in Julian, California.
2007-08-04
16:02:37
·
15 answers
·
asked by
theo48
1