I posted a question the other day for Jehovah Witnesses, asking why they were certain Jesus was not God. One of the JWs explained:
"The Sahidic Coptic New Testament, which existed 1,700 years prior to their Bible, shows --for instance-- that John 1:1 was first written exactly the way their New World Translation Bible now renders it, & therefore proves that it was later changed ..."
At the same time, I've heard from others that Jehovah Witnesses were responsible for changing the original wording of this scripture. So I'm trying to determine which is accurate information.
Can someone explain the validity of The Sahidic Coptic New Testament? How reliable is it? What is it? And where can I find other "neutral" sources concerning the original translation of John 1:1 which reads "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."
The NWT reads "In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god." Thanks
2007-04-08
18:43:52
·
32 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous