Most (if not all) pro-lifers I've talked to say it is morally permisible to take the life of a non-human primate (like a chimp or bonabo), if it is needed for meat or is doing something like destroying your crops.
But they say it is not OK to end the life of a zygote or embryo.
But what if some other non-human primates had not gone extinct?
What if today their were extant Australopithecus, or Homo habilis? Would it be OK or not to take their lives or to abort their young?
Where do you draw the line, and why?
PLEASE, if you are a evolution denier, don't answer my question.
2007-01-05
15:39:36
·
9 answers
·
asked by
skeptic
6